Literature DB >> 16558284

Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.

M R Beriau1, W B Cox, J Manning.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of wearing the Aircast(TM) Sports Stirrup, Aircast(TM) Training brace, Swede-O(TM) brace, and DonJoy(TM) Ankle Ligament Protector while running an agility course. Eighty-five high school athletes with no history of ankle injury and no experience in wearing any ankle support served as subjects. Each subject participated in four separate testing sessions. During sessions 1 and 4, subjects ran the agility course under the control (unbraced) conditions. Sessions 2 and 3 consisted of randomly wearing the ankle braces while running the agility course. A questionnaire concerning support, comfort, and restriction was completed by each subject after wearing each of the braces. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures revealed that a significant difference existed between the agility times. Tukey's post hoc test indicated that a significant difference existed between each ankle brace and the control 2 agility times as well as a control 1 and control 2 time difference. The control time difference was attributed to a learning effect. An ANOVA with repeated measures of only the four braces revealed that a significant difference existed between the agility times. Tukey's post hoc test showed the only difference was between the DonJoy Ankle Ligament Protector and the Aircast Training brace. We concluded: 1) there is limited practical performance effect upon agility while wearing an ankle brace; and 2) an athlete's perceived comfort, support, and performance restriction are contributing factors that may directly influence the effectiveness of ankle bracing.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 16558284      PMCID: PMC1317790     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.

Authors:  R T Burks; B G Bean; R Marcus; H B Barker
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

Authors:  G D Rovere; T J Clarke; C S Yates; K Burley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match.

Authors:  K H Myburgh; C L Vaughan; S K Isaacs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

  4 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The Spectral Qualities of Postural Control are Unaffected by 4 Days of Ankle-Brace Application.

Authors:  Riann M Palmieri; Christopher D Ingersoll; Mitchell L Cordova; Stephen J Kinzey
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains.

Authors:  Seda Bicici; Nihan Karatas; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

6.  The influence of external ankle braces on subjective and objective parameters of performance in a sports-related agility course.

Authors:  Dieter Rosenbaum; Nina Kamps; Kerstin Bosch; Lothar Thorwesten; Klaus Völker; Eric Eils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.

Authors:  R C Metcalfe; G A Schlabach; M A Looney; E J Renehan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Using Ankle Bracing and Taping to Decrease Range of Motion and Velocity During Inversion Perturbation While Walking.

Authors:  Emily A Hall; Janet E Simon; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.860

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.