Literature DB >> 3784875

Systematic ankle stabilization and the effect on performance.

J R Robinson, E C Frederick, L B Cooper.   

Abstract

Stabilization of the ankle joint is used as a deterrent to injury, however, insufficient or excessive ankle control can cause negative effects. This study determined the effects of systematic changes in ankle and subtalar joint stabilization on performance through an obstacle course. Data were collected on six subjects as they completed two test procedures. Ankle range of motion in the sagittal and frontal planes was determined using a modified Inman apparatus. Completion time through an obstacle course, set up on a basketball court, was used as a measure of performance. High-top basketball shoes were constructed with pockets which allowed strips of plastic (stiffeners) to be positioned just anterior and posterior to the medial and lateral malleoli. Four shoe conditions were used including the shoe with no stiffeners. Significant differences (P less than 0.05) in eversion, flexion, and inversion were found between the shoe conditions. A general trend of decreased range of motion with increased restriction was observed. Significant differences (P less than 0.05) in performance were found between the shoe conditions, with a general trend of increased times with increased restriction. These results indicate that systematic changes in the range of motion of the ankle and subtalar joints can measurably affect performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3784875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion.

Authors:  T R Lindley; T W Kernozek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.

Authors:  N Martin; R A Harter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S S Schulties; J J Saret
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.

Authors:  D L Paris; J Kokkaliaris; V Vardaxis
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Shoe-surface interaction and the reduction of injury in rugby union.

Authors:  P D Milburn; E B Barry
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Role of ankle taping and bracing in the athlete.

Authors:  M J Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Does Shoe Collar Height Influence Ankle Joint Kinematics and Kinetics in Sagittal Plane Maneuvers?

Authors:  Yang Yang; Ying Fang; Xini Zhang; Junliang He; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.