Literature DB >> 7235113

The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.

R M Fumich, A E Ellison, G J Guerin, P D Grace.   

Abstract

The Inman ankle machine was modified to determine plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion neutral, eversion neutral, plantarflexion inversion, and plantarflexion eversion before taping, immediately after taping, and with tape after a 2.5- to 3-hour football practice. The previously uninjured feet and ankles of 16 college-age football players were used. All were tape by the same method. A single-tailed paired-sample t-test was done to determine the minimun amount of restriction that could be expected for each motion after the exercise period. Ninety percent confidence intervals between untaped versus taped preexercise, untaped versus taped postexercise for all motions were determined. Inversion neutral, plantarflexion inversion, and eversion neutral had an average residual restriction after exercise of 50%, or greater than the initial restriction prior to exercise. plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, and plantarflexion eversion loosened significantly greater than 50%.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7235113     DOI: 10.1177/036354658100900307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  24 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion.

Authors:  T R Lindley; T W Kernozek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of tape and exercise on dynamic ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S M Sherwood; S S Schulthies; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Ankle braces effectively reduce recurrence of ankle sprains in female soccer players.

Authors:  S R Sharpe; J Knapik; B Jones
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The effects of spatting and ankle taping on inversion before and after exercise.

Authors:  T S Pederson; M D Ricard; G Merrill; S S Schulthies; P E Allsen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.