Literature DB >> 2039059

Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.

R T Burks1, B G Bean, R Marcus, H B Barker.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of different ankle support devices on athletic performance. Thirty varsity college athletes were tested with both ankles supported by taping, Swede-O brace, Kallassy brace or left unsupported. The athletes performed four events: broad jump, vertical leap, 10 yard shuttle run, and 40 yard sprint. The events and appliances were randomized to prevent bias by fatigue. Compared to the results when no support was used, ankle taping resulted in a significant decreased performance in the vertical jump (4%), shuttle run (1.6%), and sprint (3.5%) (P less than 0.05). Use of the Swede-O brace decreased performance in the vertical jump (4.6%), broad jump (3.6%), and time of the sprint (3.2%). Results using the Kallassy brace showed a decrease in the vertical jump (3.4%) when compared to no support. The test results of the shuttle run with taping were slower than the Kallassy brace (P less than 0.05). Wearing the Swede-O brace caused the athletes' broad jump distance to decrease more than the Kallassy brace (P less than 0.05). Subjective questionnaires supported the Kallassy brace as the most comfortable support and the one that decreased performance the least. Taping of the ankles is universally accepted for ankle prophylaxis. This study has shown a decrease in performance when ankles are taped compared to ankles with no protection. Since the decreases in performance caused by ankle braces are minor, this should not be used as a criterion for selection of prophylactic support compared to taping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039059     DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains.

Authors:  Seda Bicici; Nihan Karatas; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

5.  Effects of Preventative Ankle Taping on Planned Change-of-Direction and Reactive Agility Performance and Ankle Muscle Activity in Basketballers.

Authors:  Matthew D Jeffriess; Adrian B Schultz; Tye S McGann; Samuel J Callaghan; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The influence of external ankle braces on subjective and objective parameters of performance in a sports-related agility course.

Authors:  Dieter Rosenbaum; Nina Kamps; Kerstin Bosch; Lothar Thorwesten; Klaus Völker; Eric Eils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.

Authors:  M R Beriau; W B Cox; J Manning
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.

Authors:  N Martin; R A Harter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.