Literature DB >> 3132864

Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

G D Rovere1, T J Clarke, C S Yates, K Burley.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of taping and the effectiveness of wearing a laced stabilizer in preventing ankle injuries and reinjuries over six seasons of collegiate football practices and games were assessed retrospectively. For 1 1/2 years the players all had taped ankles, and for the remaining 4 1/2 years the players chose their type of ankle support. Over the entire period, the players chose high-top or low-top shoes as preferred. During 51,931 exposures to injury (46,789 practice-exposures and 5,142 game-exposures), the 297 players sustained 224 ankle injuries and 24 reinjuries. Tape was worn during 38,658 exposures to injury (233 players), stabilizers during 13,273 exposures (127 players). Tape had been worn when 159 of the injuries and 23 of the reinjuries occurred; a stabilizer had been worn when 37 of the injuries (P = 0.003) and one of the reinjuries occurred. The combination allowing the fewest injuries overall was low-top shoes and laced ankle stabilizers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3132864     DOI: 10.1177/036354658801600305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  50 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  J Parkkari; U M Kujala; P Kannus
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors.

Authors:  G D McKay; P A Goldie; W R Payne; B W Oakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Prophylactic Ankle Taping and Bracing: A Numbers-Needed-to-Treat and Cost-Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C. Olmsted; Luzita I. Vela; Craig R. Denegar; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion.

Authors:  T R Lindley; T W Kernozek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.

Authors:  M R Beriau; W B Cox; J Manning
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.