Literature DB >> 16558340

Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.

D L Paris1, J Kokkaliaris, V Vardaxis.   

Abstract

Tape has traditionally been used to support the ankle during activity. More recently, commercial ankle braces have been worn as an alternative. The cumulative information on the effects of taped versus braced ankle support or interbrace comparisons is inconclusive. With few exceptions, ankle brace studies have collected data soon after support conditions were administered. Plantar-dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion ranges of motion (ROM) of 30 subjects were compared under conditions of unsupported, nonelastic adhesivetaped, and Swede-O and Sub Talar Support-braced ankles. We recorded measurements before activity and after periods of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of selected activity on a motorized treadmill. All support conditions significantly reduced preactivity ROM in all directions compared to unsupported ankles. Results showed that the ankle significantly increased in plantarflexion ROM 15 minutes after the initiation of activity with tape or the SubTalar Support-brace, and after 30 minutes with the Swede-O brace. Tape showed further significant increases in plantarflexion ROM after 15-minute intervals of 30, 45, and 60 minutes of activity. All three support conditions had increased significantly in inversion ROM by 15 minutes of activity. The SubTalar Support brace showed a further significant inversion ROM increase between 15 and 30 minutes postactivity. We conclude that the Swede-O and SubTalar Support braces and tape offer significant preactivity ankle support in all four directions of movement. We also conclude that both braces offer longer postactivity support than tape. In inversion ROM and plantarflexion ROM, actions prevalent in ankle sprains, the Swede-O brace retained support longer than the SubTalar Support brace.

Year:  1995        PMID: 16558340      PMCID: PMC1317866     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  10 in total

1.  The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping.

Authors:  G L RARICK; G BIGLEY; R KARST; R M MALINA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.

Authors:  N Martin; R A Harter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Systematic ankle stabilization and the effect on performance.

Authors:  J R Robinson; E C Frederick; L B Cooper
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in sports.

Authors:  J G Garrick; R K Requa
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.182

6.  The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise.

Authors:  H H Morris; W Musnicki
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match.

Authors:  K H Myburgh; C L Vaughan; S K Isaacs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise.

Authors:  R K Laughman; T A Carr; E Y Chao; J W Youdas; F H Sim
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The influence of an ankle orthosis on the talar and calcaneal motions in chronic lateral instability of the ankle. A stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  R Löfvenberg; J Kärrholm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Comparison of DonJoy ankle ligament protector and subtalar sling ankle taping in restricting foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.

Authors:  M T Gross; A M Batten; A L Lamm; J L Lorren; J J Stevens; J M Davis; G B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.751

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Landing in netball: effects of taping and bracing the ankle.

Authors:  D M Hopper; P McNair; B C Elliott
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Spectral Qualities of Postural Control are Unaffected by 4 Days of Ankle-Brace Application.

Authors:  Riann M Palmieri; Christopher D Ingersoll; Mitchell L Cordova; Stephen J Kinzey
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Changes in ankle joint proprioception resulting from strips of athletic tape applied over the skin.

Authors:  G G Simoneau; R M Degner; C A Kramper; K H Kittleson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Effects of tape and exercise on dynamic ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S M Sherwood; S S Schulthies; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Kinesthesia Is Not Affected by Functional Ankle Instability Status.

Authors:  Tricia J Hubbard; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.