| Literature DB >> 16558340 |
D L Paris1, J Kokkaliaris, V Vardaxis.
Abstract
Tape has traditionally been used to support the ankle during activity. More recently, commercial ankle braces have been worn as an alternative. The cumulative information on the effects of taped versus braced ankle support or interbrace comparisons is inconclusive. With few exceptions, ankle brace studies have collected data soon after support conditions were administered. Plantar-dorsiflexion and inversion-eversion ranges of motion (ROM) of 30 subjects were compared under conditions of unsupported, nonelastic adhesivetaped, and Swede-O and Sub Talar Support-braced ankles. We recorded measurements before activity and after periods of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of selected activity on a motorized treadmill. All support conditions significantly reduced preactivity ROM in all directions compared to unsupported ankles. Results showed that the ankle significantly increased in plantarflexion ROM 15 minutes after the initiation of activity with tape or the SubTalar Support-brace, and after 30 minutes with the Swede-O brace. Tape showed further significant increases in plantarflexion ROM after 15-minute intervals of 30, 45, and 60 minutes of activity. All three support conditions had increased significantly in inversion ROM by 15 minutes of activity. The SubTalar Support brace showed a further significant inversion ROM increase between 15 and 30 minutes postactivity. We conclude that the Swede-O and SubTalar Support braces and tape offer significant preactivity ankle support in all four directions of movement. We also conclude that both braces offer longer postactivity support than tape. In inversion ROM and plantarflexion ROM, actions prevalent in ankle sprains, the Swede-O brace retained support longer than the SubTalar Support brace.Year: 1995 PMID: 16558340 PMCID: PMC1317866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Athl Train ISSN: 1062-6050 Impact factor: 2.860