Literature DB >> 6507713

The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match.

K H Myburgh, C L Vaughan, S K Isaacs.   

Abstract

The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after exercise were studied. Twelve league squash players played two matches, each lasting 1 hour. Two different ankle guards, and two types of tape applied by the same method, served as supports. A specially designed goniometer with electronic digital display (accuracy 1 degree) was used to determine joint range of motion: plantar-flexion and dorsiflexion, neutral inversion and eversion, plantar-flexed inversion and eversion. The results were statistically analyzed to determine the significance of the restriction provided by the supports. This revealed that the two ankle guards provided no significant support. The two tapes, however, provided significant support before exercise and after 10 minutes but not after 1 hour of exercise. Nonelastic (zinc oxide) tape proved to be the most restrictive at all times measured, especially prior to exercise, when the ankle's range of motion was decreased between 30% and 50%. However, once exercise commenced, the tape stretched, and restriction became less effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6507713     DOI: 10.1177/036354658401200607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Collegiate Football Players' Ankle Range of Motion and Dynamic Balance in Braced and Self-Adherent-Taped Conditions.

Authors:  Kristin Willeford; Justin M Stanek; Todd A McLoda
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.

Authors:  M R Beriau; W B Cox; J Manning
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.

Authors:  N Martin; R A Harter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.

Authors:  R C Metcalfe; G A Schlabach; M A Looney; E J Renehan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  The effects of selected ankle appliances on postural control.

Authors:  S J Kinzey; C D Ingersoll; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

Authors:  D L Paris
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.