Literature DB >> 16496721

Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.

Prahlad Gupta1, John Lipinski, Emrah Aktunc.   

Abstract

Study of the phonological similarity effect (PSE) in immediate serial recall (ISR) has produced a conflicting body of results. Five experiments tested various theoretical ideas that together may help integrate these results. Experiments 1 and 2 tested alternative accounts that explain the effect of phonological similarity on item recall in terms of feature overlap, linguistic structure, or serial order. In each experiment, the participants' ISR was assessed for rhyming, alliterative, and similar nonrhyming/nonalliterative lists. The results were consistent with the predictions of the serial order account, with item recall being higher for rhyming than for alliterative lists and higher for alliterative than for similar nonrhyming/nonalliterative lists. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that these item recall differences are reduced when list items repeat across lists. Experiment 5 employed rhyming and dissimilar one-syllable and two-syllable lists to demonstrate that recall for similar (rhyming) lists can be better than that for dissimilar lists even in a typical ISR task in which words are used, providing a direct reversal of the classic PSE. These and other previously published results are interpreted and integrated within a proposed theoretical framework that offers an account of the PSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16496721     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; M R Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Immediate free recall of drug names: effects of similarity and availability.

Authors:  Bruce L Lambert; Ken-Yu Chang; Swu-Jane Lin
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen; Thor Birger Eriksen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-05

5.  Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?

Authors:  Anthony B Fallon; Eva Mak; Gerald Tehan; Charmaine Daly
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005 Apr-May

Review 6.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

Review 7.  Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: computational and neural bases.

Authors:  P Gupta; B MacWhinney
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The sequential curing effect in speech production.

Authors:  C A Sevald; G S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-11

9.  Modality and phonological similarity effects in serial recall: does one's own voice play a role?

Authors:  S E Gathercole; J M Gardiner; V H Gregg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-03

Review 10.  The phonological loop as a language learning device.

Authors:  A Baddeley; S Gathercole; C Papagno
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  18 in total

1.  Revisiting backward recall and benchmark memory effects: a reply to Bireta et al. (2010).

Authors:  Katherine Guérard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Samantha C Burns; Cindy Chamberland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

4.  Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.

Authors:  Brooke N Macnamara; Adam B Moore; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

5.  Verbal working memory and linguistic long-term memory: Exploring the lexical cohort effect.

Authors:  Benjamin Kowialiewski; Steve Majerus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

6.  The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Brooke N Macnamara; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

8.  Chunk formation in immediate memory and how it relates to data compression.

Authors:  Mustapha Chekaf; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-06-29

9.  The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Bradley R Postle; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.