Literature DB >> 21503805

Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.

Brooke N Macnamara1, Adam B Moore, Andrew R A Conway.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to examine the effect of phonological similarity in simple and complex memory span tasks. In Experiment 1, participants performed either a simple or a complex span task, and the memoranda within lists were either phonologically similar or distinct. Phonologically similar lists consisted of words that rhymed.The simple span task was word span. There were two complex span tasks; one was the original reading span task, and the other was a variant of reading span in which all the sentences within a list were contextually related. The classic phonological similarity decrement was observed in word span. In contrast, phonological similarity facilitation was observed in both versions of reading span. This facilitation effect was further investigated in Experiment 2 using two new versions of reading span. In Experiment 2, the sentences in reading span were either short or long, and the memoranda were presented separately from, and were unrelated to, the sentences. Again, words within phonologically similar lists rhymed, and again, facilitation was observed. In Experiment 3, phonological similarity was operationalized in terms of feature overlap, rather than rhyme. The classic phonological similarity decrement was still observed in word span, but facilitation was not observed in complex span. The results suggest that phonological similarity, when operationalized using words that rhyme, serves as a list retrieval cue and that complex span tasks are more dependent on cue-driven memory retrieval mechanisms than are simple span tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21503805     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0100-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; M R Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model.

Authors:  James S Nairne
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Mariko Osaka; Naoyuki Osaka; Hirohito Kondo; Masanao Morishita; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshihiko Aso; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Functional roles of the cingulo-frontal network in performance on working memory.

Authors:  Hirohito Kondo; Masanao Morishita; Naoyuki Osaka; Mariko Osaka; Hidenao Fukuyama; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

6.  Short-term memory for serial order: a recurrent neural network model.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; David C Plaut
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

Review 9.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

10.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall.

Authors:  M P Page; D Norris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Brooke N Macnamara; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology.

Authors:  Ben Alderson-Day; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Dissociating rehearsal and refreshing in the maintenance of verbal information in 8-year-old children.

Authors:  Gérome Mora; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.