Literature DB >> 27048510

Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.

Michael Chow1, Brooke N Macnamara2, Andrew R A Conway2.   

Abstract

In a series of four experiments, we explored what conditions are sufficient to produce a phonological similarity facilitation effect in working memory span tasks. By using the same set of memoranda, but differing the secondary-task requirements across experiments, we showed that a phonological similarity facilitation effect is dependent upon the semantic relationship between the memoranda and the secondary-task stimuli, and is robust to changes in the representation, ordering, and pool size of the secondary-task stimuli. These findings are consistent with interference accounts of memory (Brown, Neath, & Chater, Psychological Review, 114, 539-576, 2007; Oberauer, Lewandowsky, Farrell, Jarrold, & Greaves, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 779-819, 2012), whereby rhyming stimuli provide a form of categorical similarity that allows distractors to be excluded from retrieval at recall.

Keywords:  Interference/inhibition; Memory retrieval; Short-term memory; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048510     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0609-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Reversing the phonological similarity effect.

Authors:  J S Nairne; M R Kelley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model.

Authors:  J Richard Hanley; Eirini Bakopoulou
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

3.  Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.

Authors:  Prahlad Gupta; John Lipinski; Emrah Aktunc
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.

Authors:  Brooke N Macnamara; Adam B Moore; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

7.  Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Gérôme Mora; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?

Authors:  Janet D Larsen; Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-11

9.  A temporal ratio model of memory.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Ian Neath; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Low intensity white noise improves performance in auditory working memory task: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Elza Othman; Ahmad Nazlim Yusoff; Mazlyfarina Mohamad; Hanani Abdul Manan; Vincent Giampietro; Aini Ismafairus Abd Hamid; Mariam Adawiah Dzulkifli; Syazarina Sharis Osman; Wan Ilma Dewiputri Wan Burhanuddin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-09-13

2.  Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Elizabeth Monzingo; Angela M AuBuchon
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2020-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.