Literature DB >> 23472955

Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.

Jeffry A Coady1, Elina Mainela-Arnold, Julia L Evans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The present study examined how phonological and lexical knowledge influences memory in children with specific language impairments (SLI). Previous work showed recall advantages for typical adults and children due to word frequency and phonotactic pattern frequency and a recall disadvantage due to phonological similarity among words. While children with SLI have well-documented memory difficulties, it is not clear whether these language knowledge factors also influence recall in this population. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Sixteen children with SLI (mean age = 10;2) and chronological age-matched typically developing children (CAM) controls recalled lists of words differing in phonological similarity, word frequency and phonotactic pattern frequency. While previous studies used a small set of words appearing in multiple word lists, the current study used a larger set of words, without replacement, so that children could not gain practice with individual test items. OUTCOMES &
RESULTS: All main effects were significant. Interactions revealed that children with SLI were affected by similarity, but less so than their peers, comparably affected by word frequency and unaffected by phonotactic pattern frequency. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Results due to phonological similarity suggest that children with SLI use less efficient encoding, while results due to word frequency and phonotactic pattern frequency were mixed. Children with SLI used coarse-grained language knowledge (word frequency) comparably with peers, but were less able to use fine-grained knowledge (phonotactic pattern frequency). Paired with phonological similarity results, this suggests that children with SLI have difficulty establishing robust phonological knowledge for use in language tasks.
© 2013 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23472955      PMCID: PMC4084655          DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  40 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A problem of language disorder: length versus structure.

Authors:  P Menyuk; P L Looney
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1972-06

6.  Effects of alterations of prosodic features on the sequencing performance of aphasic children.

Authors:  J Stark; R Poppen; M Z May
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-12

7.  Beyond capacity limitations II: effects of lexical processes on word recall in verbal working memory tasks in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans; Jeffry Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Computer simulations of developmental change: the contributions of working memory capacity and long-term knowledge.

Authors:  Gary Jones; Fernand Gobet; Julian M Pine
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10

9.  Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.

Authors:  Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans; Jeffry A Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Nonword repetition in specific language impairment: more than a phonological short-term memory deficit.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Susan E Gathercole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Cognitive Predictors of Spoken Word Recognition in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorders.

Authors:  Julia L Evans; Ronald B Gillam; James W Montgomery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Verbal Short-Term Memory in Young Children With Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Stacy A Wagovich; Bryan T Brown
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Rapid naming by children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Effects of Frequency and Predictability on Repetition in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Justin B Kueser; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Neural patterns elicited by lexical processing in adolescents with specific language impairment: support for the procedural deficit hypothesis?

Authors:  Julia L Evans; Mandy J Maguire; Marisa L Sizemore
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.025

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.