Literature DB >> 15279435

Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.

Arild Lian1, Paul Johan Karlsen, Thor Birger Eriksen.   

Abstract

This study shows that the classical phonological similarity effect (PSE) in immediate serial recall is critically affected by the lexicality of list items, the type of phonological similarity involved, and the scoring procedure. PSE was present in the serial recall score when phonologically distinct words were compared to words that share the middle vowel and end consonant (rhyming lists). PSE was absent in the serial recall score when phonologically distinct words were compared to words that share the initial and final consonants (consonant frame lists). There was a reversal of PSE in serial recall of nonwords when comparing distinct lists to both types of similar lists. Recall accuracy on the other hand was higher for distinct lists regardless of lexicality. Item errors dominated in relation to order errors in the case of nonwords, whereas order errors dominated in relation to item errors in the case of words. Furthermore, order errors were more common for phonologically similar lists, whereas item errors were more common for phonologically distinct lists. This may be the result of intra-list and inter-list interference, respectively. The dominance of the former error type may cause a classical PSE, whereas the dominance of the latter error type may cause a reversal of PSE. Finally, an item identification task yielded no evidence of an association between intra-list interference and discriminability of items in a list.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279435     DOI: 10.1080/096582103440000426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  8 in total

1.  Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

3.  Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.

Authors:  Prahlad Gupta; John Lipinski; Emrah Aktunc
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Tradeoffs between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Dominic Guitard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.521

6.  The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Bradley R Postle; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Anders Gravir Imenes; Kaja Johannessen; Tor Endestad; Arild Lian
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-01-14

8.  Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2008-03-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.