Literature DB >> 16195942

Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

E Claes1, G Evers-Kiebooms, L Denayer, M Decruyenaere, A Boogaerts, K Philippe, E Legius.   

Abstract

This prospective study evaluates emotional functioning and illness representations in 68 unaffected women (34 carriers/34 noncarriers) 1 year after predictive testing for BRCA1/2 mutations when offered within a multidisciplinary approach. Carriers had higher subjective risk perception of breast cancer than noncarriers. Carriers who did not have prophylactic oophorectomy had the highest risk perception of ovarian cancer. No differences were found between carriers and noncarriers regarding perceived seriousness and perceived control of breast and ovarian cancer. Mean levels of distress were within normal ranges. Only few women showed an overall pattern of clinically elevated distress. Cancer-specific distress and state-anxiety significantly decreased in noncarriers from pre- to posttest while general distress remained about the same. There were no significant changes in distress in the group of carriers except for ovarian cancer distress which significantly decreased from pre- to posttest. Our study did not reveal adverse effects of predictive testing when offered in the context of a multidisciplinary approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16195942     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-1371-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

1.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

2.  Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Andrea Boogaerts; Kristien Philippe; Eric Legius
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.104

3.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time.

Authors:  Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 5.  Distress in individuals facing predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant late-onset disorders: comparing questionnaire results with in-depth interviews. Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup.

Authors:  A C DudokdeWit; A Tibben; H J Duivenvoorden; M F Niermeijer; J Passchier; R W Trijsburg
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1998-01-06

6.  Predictive testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a psychological framework for pre-test counselling.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Welkenhuysen; E Claes; E Legius; K Demyttenaere
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Authors:  J Audrain; M D Schwartz; C Lerman; C Hughes; B N Peshkin; B Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

9.  Impact of genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Starlene Loader; Cleveland G Shields; Peter T Rowley
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

Review 10.  Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jeannie V Pasacreta
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Why me? Why not me?

Authors:  Kathleen D Valverde
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-16

4.  Influences of race and breast density on related cognitive and emotion outcomes before mandated breast density notification.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Zeynep Yilmaz-Saab; Julie Shultz; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Risk Perception and Psychological Distress in Genetic Counselling for Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  G Cicero; R De Luca; P Dorangricchia; G Lo Coco; C Guarnaccia; D Fanale; V Calò; A Russo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Psychological and cancer-specific distress at 18 months post-testing in women with demonstrated BRCA1 mutations for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Pål Møller; Ketil Heimdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.