Literature DB >> 16972194

Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Shoshana Shiloh1.   

Abstract

In this article the Self Regulatory Theory (Leventhal, 1970; Leventhan H., Benyamini, Brownlee, Diefenbach, Leventhal E.A., Patrick-Miller, & Robitaille, 1997) is presented as a framework for conceptualizing genetic counseling. Findings published in the genetic counseling literature are re-interpreted from the perspective of the theory. Clients are seen as active information processors rather than passive receivers of information. Research related to clients' representations of genetic causality of disease and specific genetic conditions is reviewed. Associations of genetic illness representations to self representations, coping and health behaviors are examined, and suggestions are made for applications of the theory in research and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16972194     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  70 in total

Review 1.  Research directions in genetic counselling: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Pilnick; R Dingwall
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-08

2.  Genetic counseling gone awry: miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients.

Authors:  C H Browner; H Mabel Preloran; Maria Christina Casado; Harold N Bass; Ann P Walker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

4.  Cultural diversity in causal attributions for illness: the role of the supernatural.

Authors:  H Landrine; E A Klonoff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-04

5.  Family history and perceived vulnerability to some common diseases: a study of young people and their parents.

Authors:  M Ponder; J Lee; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Longitudinal study of the carrier testing process for fragile X syndrome: perceptions and coping.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; J A Sullivan; D V Dawson; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01-01

7.  Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  A Y Kinney; Y A Choi; B DeVellis; E Kobetz; R C Millikan; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

Authors:  E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; G A Chase; R R Faden; G Geller; K J Hofman; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Social system responses to Huntington disease.

Authors:  S Kessler; M Bloch
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1989-03
View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Re-conceptualizing risk in genetic counseling: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  Colonoscopy use following mutation detection in Lynch syndrome: exploring a role for cancer screening in adaptation.

Authors:  D W Hadley; S Ashida; J F Jenkins; K A Calzone; I R Kirsch; L M Koehly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Making sense of genetic uncertainty: the role of religion and spirituality.

Authors:  Mary T White
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  "I don't have to know why it snows, I just have to shovel it!": Addiction Recovery, Genetic Frameworks, and Biological Citizenship.

Authors:  Molly J Dingel; Jenny Ostergren; Kathleen Heaney; Barbara A Koenig; Jennifer McCormick
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2017-07-11

9.  Beliefs about heritability of cancer and health information seeking and preventive behaviors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Christina R Lachance; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Effects of genetic counseling for hypertension on changes in lifestyle behaviors among African-American women.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Chun Yi Wu
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.