Literature DB >> 12704636

Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time.

Jean E Wylie1, Ken R Smith, Jeffrey R Botkin.   

Abstract

Concerns about psychological distress have arisen regarding genetic testing for susceptibility to late-onset diseases such as breast and/or ovarian cancer. Early results do not show large-scale psychological distress among those tested; therefore, research is now focusing on identifying subgroups that may be at risk for negative outcomes. Social support has been shown to buffer both negative physical and psychological outcomes in health research. The role of spouses as part of the tested person's social support system is shown to be significant in a sample of 57 BRCA1 mutation carriers. Separately, the tested person's perception of his/her spouse's anxiety and his/her perception of the spouse's support at the time of testing are predictive of the tested person's psychological distress up to 2 years after testing. The interaction of the two variables is even more predictive. For those tested who perceived their spouse to be both anxious and nonsupportive at the time of testing, distress levels reached clinically significant levels 1 week after results were received and remained above clinical threshold measured 4 months, 1 year, and 2 years after testing. While the effects were greatest for women, they were significant for both male and female carriers. These findings are an important addition to the literature and will augment clinicians' ability to identify individuals potentially at risk for negative responses to adverse genetic test results. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704636     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  12 in total

1.  Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; Timothy W Smith; Ken R Smith; Robert T Croyle; John M Ruiz; John C Kircher; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Kate Brain; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Factors associated with intrusive cancer-related worries in women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Barbara France; Gethin Griffith; Gethin Griffin; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Adaptation of couples living with a high risk of breast/ovarian cancer and the association with risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Rachel Shapira; Erin Turbitt; Lori H Erby; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein; Gillian W Hooker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

Authors:  E Claes; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Decruyenaere; A Boogaerts; K Philippe; E Legius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Psychosocial factors associated with quality of life among individuals attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Anniken Hamang Carlsson; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Gunilla Berglund; Gerd Karin Natvig
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A Counselling Model for BRCA1/2 Genetic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Caitlin Mauer; Sara Spencer; Jeffery Dungan; Karen Hurley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Prevalence and correlates of mothers and fathers attending pretest cancer genetic counseling together.

Authors:  Tiffani A Demarco; Rachel H Nusbaum; Beth N Peshkin; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.