Literature DB >> 18219587

Psychological and cancer-specific distress at 18 months post-testing in women with demonstrated BRCA1 mutations for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Jon G Reichelt1, Pål Møller, Ketil Heimdal, Alv A Dahl.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this longitudinal study was to explore both levels of and factors predictive of psychological and cancer-specific distress in women with demonstrated BRCA1 mutations belonging to families with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).
METHODS: We included 214 women from HBOC families who had BRCA1 testing, and who were examined with a mailed questionnaire at pre-test (T1), 6 weeks after getting the test result (T2) and 18 months later (T3). Self-rating instruments for psychological distress, cancer-specific distress and personality traits were used.
RESULTS: Hardly any significant changes were observed concerning the levels of psychological and cancer-specific distress from T1 via T2 to T3 for the total group or those with carrier or non-carrier status, while women with cancer had a significant reduction of cancer-specific distress over time. The pre-test levels of psychological and cancer-specific distress were significant and strong predictors of these types of distress at T3. The personality trait of neuroticism made a significant contribution to both types of distress at pre-test, and a small separate contribution to distress at T3. Carrier status, history of personal cancer, pre-test levels of optimism or multidimensional health locus of control did not significantly predict distress at T3.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing or test results were not found to induce psychological or cancer-specific psychological distress at long-term. Neuroticism had a decisive influence at both pre-test and long-term levels of distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18219587     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9182-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  34 in total

1.  Uptake of BRCA1 genetic testing in adult sisters and daughters of known mutation carriers in Norway.

Authors:  Trine Levin Bodd; Jon Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale amongst women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Thewes; B Meiser; I B Hickie
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancers in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Jon G Reichelt; Alv A Dahl; Ketil Heimdal; Lovise Maehle; Astrid Stormorken; Pål Møller
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Rasch analysis of the dimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Authors:  A B Smith; E P Wright; R Rush; D P Stark; G Velikova; P J Selby
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Broadstock; S Michie; T Marteau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Authors:  J Audrain; M D Schwartz; C Lerman; C Hughes; B N Peshkin; B Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

10.  BRCA1 testing with definitive results: a prospective study of psychological distress in a large clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  6 in total

1.  Psychological distress related to BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Merete Bjørnslett; Alv A Dahl; Øystein Sørebø; Anne Dørum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The influence of acculturation and breast cancer-specific distress on perceived barriers to genetic testing for breast cancer among women of African descent.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Tiffany A Edwards; Andrea Forman; Karen Brown; Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Dana H Bovbjerg; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Rebekah Kwa; Sarah Ephraums; Mathilda Wilding; Lavvina Thiyagarajan; Jane Fleming; Katrina Moore; Yemima Berman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.446

5.  Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress.

Authors:  K M Landsbergen; J B Prins; H G Brunner; N Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Do Attachment Style and Emotion Regulation Strategies Indicate Distress in Predictive Testing?

Authors:  Lucienne B van der Meer; Erik van Duijn; Erik J Giltay; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.