Literature DB >> 14533449

Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.

Jeannie V Pasacreta1.   

Abstract

The identification of the BRCA1/2 genes, and their possible etiologic relationship with various forms of inherited cancer, has been recognized universally as a cornerstone in the search for cancer's genetic link and has made it possible to identify specific individuals and families who harbor a mutation in one of these predisposition genes. Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility may pose unanticipated psychological and social problems. Because of the recent availability of predisposition genetic testing, research efforts have begun to investigate factors that may influence an individual's intention to undergo testing and the psychosocial sequelae associated with testing. The purpose of this article is to provide an integrative review of the literature that will delineate what is currently known about the psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Important generalizations from the literature include: (a) a positive test for breast cancer susceptibility may ignite a psychological response similar to the diagnosis of breast cancer itself; (b) there is likely a subset of individuals at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who are also at risk for sustained psychosocial problems; (c) available literature challenges a common notion that only individuals with a positive test result will need psychosocial services; and (d) at-risk individuals are basing health care decisions on genetic testing information, thus they are making important decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Clinical issues and directions for future research were highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14533449     DOI: 10.1081/cnv-120022380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  28 in total

1.  Attitudes toward information about genetic risk for cognitive impairment after cancer chemotherapy: breast cancer survivors compared with healthy controls.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Jessica L Burris; Erin Walsh; Brent J Small; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Supervision of psychosocial skills in genetic counseling.

Authors:  L DiAnne Borders; Sonja Eubanks; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

7.  Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: a qualitative study of patient preferences.

Authors:  Karen Hurley; Lisa R Rubin; Allison Werner-Lin; Michal Sagi; Yelena Kemel; Rikki Stern; Aliza Phillips; Ina Cholst; Noah Kauff; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African-Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; James E Coxworth; Sara E Simonson; Joseph B Fanning
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

9.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Chantal Lammens; Eveline Bleiker; Neil Aaronson; Annette Vriends; Margreet Ausems; Maaike Jansweijer; Anja Wagner; Rolf Sijmons; Ans van den Ouweland; Rob van der Luijt; Liesbeth Spruijt; Encarna Gómez García; Mariëlle Ruijs; Senno Verhoef
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.