Literature DB >> 9706364

Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

J Audrain1, M D Schwartz, C Lerman, C Hughes, B N Peshkin, B Biesecker.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was two-fold: (a) to characterize the psychological status of women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who self-refer for genetic counseling and BRCA1 testing; and (b) to identify specific demographic, personality, and appraisal factors that contribute to cancer-specific distress and general distress in this group of women. Participants were 256 women ages 18 and older who had at least one first-degree relative (FDR) with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Participants were recruited through breast cancer clinics and obstetrics/gynecology departments at two medical centers by responding to program information described in a brochure. The results revealed moderate distress levels in this population. The results of a hierarchical regression of general distress indicated that women with higher levels of general distress were less likely to be married, less optimistic, and had heightened breast cancer risk perceptions accompanied by feelings of low perceptions of control over the development of breast cancer (R2 = .44, p = .0001). Women with higher levels of cancer-specific distress tended to be younger and non-White and had low perceptions of control over developing breast cancer (R2 = .15, p = .0002). These findings suggest that self-referred genetic counseling participants may be psychologically vulnerable and may benefit from interventions designed to decrease distress and the perceived absence of control over developing breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9706364     DOI: 10.1007/BF02895156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  32 in total

1.  Heightened psychobiological reactivity to laboratory stressors in healthy women at familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Sandra G Zakowski; William Gerin; Jean Mamakos; Thomas Pickering; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

2.  Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

3.  Recommendation recall and satisfaction after attending breast/ovarian cancer risk counseling.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Lizbeth A Hoke; Rosemary B Duda; Nadine M Tung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Correlates of depressive symptoms among women seeking cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment at a high-risk cancer clinic.

Authors:  Molly Middlecamp Kodl; Judith W Lee; Alicia K Matthews; Shelly A Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Factors associated with psychological distress among women of African descent at high risk for BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Yael R Cukier; Hayley S Thompson; Katarina Sussner; Andrea Forman; Lina Jandorf; Tiffany Edwards; Dana H Bovbjerg; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

7.  Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Sheri A Babb; Elizabeth M Swisher; Hope N Heller; Alison J Whelan; David G Mutch; Thomas J Herzog; Janet S Rader
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Women's satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Tiffani A Demarco; Bryn D Mars; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  A Counselling Model for BRCA1/2 Genetic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.