Literature DB >> 16172600

Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place.

Dhanraj Vishwanath1, Ahna R Girshick, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

A picture viewed from its center of projection generates the same retinal image as the original scene, so the viewer perceives the scene correctly. When a picture is viewed from other locations, the retinal image specifies a different scene, but we normally do not notice the changes. We investigated the mechanism underlying this perceptual invariance by studying the perceived shapes of pictured objects viewed from various locations. We also manipulated information about the orientation of the picture surface. When binocular information for surface orientation was available, perceived shape was nearly invariant across a wide range of viewing angles. By varying the projection angle and the position of a stimulus in the picture, we found that invariance is achieved through an estimate of local surface orientation, not from geometric information in the picture. We present a model that explains invariance and other phenomena (such as perceived distortions in wide-angle pictures).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172600      PMCID: PMC2727473          DOI: 10.1038/nn1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  18 in total

Review 1.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size.

Authors:  D Regan; S J Hamstra
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Sergei Gepshtein; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

5.  Shape constancy in pictorial representation.

Authors:  H Wallach; F J Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-04

Review 6.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation.

Authors:  K A Stevens
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion.

Authors:  P Burt; B Julesz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Picture perception: an analysis of visual compensation.

Authors:  R R Rosinski; T Mulholland; D Degelman; J Farber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-12

10.  Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle.

Authors:  J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  23 in total

1.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Differential intrinsic bias of the 3-D perceptual environment and its role in shape constancy.

Authors:  Antonio Aznar-Casanova; Matthias Sven Keil; Manuel Moreno; Hans Supèr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Picture perception reveals mental geometry of 3D scene inferences.

Authors:  Erin Koch; Famya Baig; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Integration of texture and disparity cues to surface slant in dorsal visual cortex.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; Hiroshi Ban; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05

6.  Perception of 3-D Layout in Stereo Displays.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Robert T Held; Ahna R Girshick
Journal:  Inf Disp (1975)       Date:  2009-01

7.  The perceptual basis of common photographic practice.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Elise A Piazza; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Joohwan Kim; David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Camera Focal Length and the Perception of Pictures.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Emily A Cooper; Elise A Piazza
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

10.  Perception of Perspective Distortions in Image-Based Rendering.

Authors:  Peter Vangorp; Christian Richardt; Emily A Cooper; Gaurav Chaurasia; Martin S Banks; George Drettakis
Journal:  ACM Trans Graph       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 5.414

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.