Literature DB >> 7892735

Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

M S Landy1, L T Maloney, E B Johnston, M Young.   

Abstract

Various visual cues provide information about depth and shape in a scene. When several of these cues are simultaneously available in a single location in the scene, the visual system attempts to combine them. In this paper, we discuss three key issues relevant to the experimental analysis of depth cue combination in human vision: cue promotion, dynamic weighting of cues, and robustness of cue combination. We review recent psychophysical studies of human depth cue combination in light of these issues. We organize the discussion and review as the development of a model of the depth cue combination process termed modified weak fusion (MWF). We relate the MWF framework to Bayesian theories of cue combination. We argue that the MWF model is consistent with previous experimental results and is a parsimonious summary of these results. While the MWF model is motivated by normative considerations, it is primarily intended to guide experimental analysis of depth cue combination in human vision. We describe experimental methods, analogous to perturbation analysis, that permit us to analyze depth cue combination in novel ways. In particular these methods allow us to investigate the key issues we have raised. We summarize recent experimental tests of the MWF framework that use these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7892735     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  202 in total

1.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance.

Authors:  J R Tresilian; M Mon-Williams; B M Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Susannah Murphy; Isla McKenna; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interaction of color and geometric cues in depth perception: when does "red" mean "near"?

Authors:  Christophe R C Guibal; Birgitta Dresp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-02-10

5.  Importance of binocular vision in foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation.

Authors:  Graham J Chapman; Andy Scally; John G Buckley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Robust averaging during perceptual judgment is not optimal.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Combination of texture and color cues in visual segmentation.

Authors:  Toni P Saarela; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Estimating the glossiness transfer function induced by illumination change and testing its transitivity.

Authors:  Katja Doerschner; Huseyin Boyaci; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Robust visual estimation as source separation.

Authors:  Mordechai Z Juni; Manish Singh; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Allocentric kin recognition is not affected by facial inversion.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Lisa M DeBruine; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.