Literature DB >> 2958581

Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle.

J E Cutting1.   

Abstract

Pictures and cinema seen at a slant present the optics of virtual objects that are distorted and inconsistent with their real counterparts. In particular, it should not be possible for moving objects on slanted film and television screens to be seen as rigid, at least according to rules of linear perspective. Previous approaches to this problem have suggested that some process (perhaps cognitive) rectifies the optics of objects in slanted pictures to derive true shape and preserve shape constancy. The means for this rectification is usually thought to be based on recovery of true screen slant. In three experiments I show that this account is unnecessary and insufficient to explain the perception of rotating, rectangular objects in slanted cinema. I present data in favor of an alternate view, one in which the information is sufficient for perceivers to determine rigidity in an object on slanted screens, at least for parallel projections. In the human visual system, local measurements of objects are apparently made according to projective geometry; in those measurements, small amounts of certain distortions in projection are tolerated. Stimuli that appear nonrigid are ones that violate certain local principles, known as Perkins's laws, of projections of rectangular solids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2958581     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences.

Authors:  J T Todd; P Bressan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

2.  Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-18       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences.

Authors:  J T Todd; J F Norman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

4.  Visual perception of markings.

Authors:  W H Ittelson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

5.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

6.  "Smart" mechanisms emerging from cooperation and competition between modules.

Authors:  J Wagemans
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

7.  For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Fred W Mast; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Picture perception is array-specific: viewing angle versus apparent orientation.

Authors:  T O Halloran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

9.  The detection of real and apparent concomitant rotation in a three-dimensional cube: implications for perceptual interactions.

Authors:  M A Peterson; G C Shyi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

10.  The frame turns also: factors in differential rotation in pictures.

Authors:  T O Halloran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.