Literature DB >> 21778252

The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Takashi Shibata1, Joohwan Kim, David M Hoffman, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Recent increased usage of stereo displays has been accompanied by public concern about potential adverse effects associated with prolonged viewing of stereo imagery. There are numerous potential sources of adverse effects, but we focused on how vergence-accommodation conflicts in stereo displays affect visual discomfort and fatigue. In one experiment, we examined the effect of viewing distance on discomfort and fatigue. We found that conflicts of a given dioptric value were slightly less comfortable at far than at near distance. In a second experiment, we examined the effect of the sign of the vergence-accommodation conflict on discomfort and fatigue. We found that negative conflicts (stereo content behind the screen) are less comfortable at far distances and that positive conflicts (content in front of screen) are less comfortable at near distances. In a third experiment, we measured phoria and the zone of clear single binocular vision, which are clinical measurements commonly associated with correcting refractive error. Those measurements predicted susceptibility to discomfort in the first two experiments. We discuss the relevance of these findings for a wide variety of situations including the viewing of mobile devices, desktop displays, television, and cinema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21778252      PMCID: PMC3369815          DOI: 10.1167/11.8.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  20 in total

1.  Observations on accommodative convergence; especially its nonlinear relationships.

Authors:  T G MARTENS; K N OGLE
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  User-preferred position of computer displays: effects of display size.

Authors:  Gwanseob Shin; Sudeep Hegde
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  The effects of visual display distance on eye accommodation, head posture, and vision and neck symptoms.

Authors:  David Rempel; Kirsten Willms; Jeffrey Anshel; Wolfgang Jaschinski; James Sheedy
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The variation of phoria with age.

Authors:  M J HIRSCH; M ALPERN; H L SCHULTZ
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1948-11

6.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.

Authors:  Gordon D Love; David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; James Gao; Andrew K Kirby; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Prevalence of heterophoria and associations with refractive error, heterotropia and ethnicity in Australian school children.

Authors:  Jody F Leone; Elaine Cornell; Ian G Morgan; Paul Mitchell; Annette Kifley; Jie Jin Wang; Kathryn A Rose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Dynamic measures of vergence accommodation.

Authors:  V V Krishnan; D Shirachi; L Stark
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-07

9.  Phoria, vergence, and fixation disparity in oculomotor problems.

Authors:  J E Sheedy; J J Saladin
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-07

10.  Population study of fixation disparity, heterophoria, and vergence.

Authors:  J J Saladin; J E Sheedy
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1978-11
View more
  43 in total

1.  Visual Discomfort and the Temporal Properties of the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict.

Authors:  Joohwan Kim; David Kane; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects.

Authors:  Tianqi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-12-15

3.  Optimizing virtual reality for all users through gaze-contingent and adaptive focus displays.

Authors:  Nitish Padmanaban; Robert Konrad; Tal Stramer; Emily A Cooper; Gordon Wetzstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Vergence-accommodation conflict in virtual reality displays induces phoria adaptation.

Authors:  Marius M Paulus; Andreas Straube; Thomas Eggert
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  3D-holoscopic imaging: a new dimension to enhance imaging in minimally invasive therapy in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan K Makanjuola; Amar Aggoun; Mohammad Swash; Philippe C R Grange; Benjamin Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort.

Authors:  Paul V Johnson; Jared Aq Parnell; Joohwan Kim; Christopher D Saunter; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Visual Discomfort with Stereo 3D Displays when the Head is Not Upright.

Authors:  David Kane; Robert T Held; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-09

10.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.