Literature DB >> 14999059

Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?

Martin S Banks1, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy.   

Abstract

Spatial stereoresolution (the finest detectable modulation of binocular disparity) is much poorer than luminance resolution (finest detectable luminance variation). In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examined four factors that could cause low stereoresolution: (1) the sampling properties of the stimulus, (2) the disparity gradient limit, (3) low-pass spatial filtering by mechanisms early in the visual process, and (4) the method by which binocular matches are computed. Our experimental results reveal the contributions of the first three factors. A theoretical analysis of binocular matching by interocular correlation reveals the contribution of the fourth: the highest attainable stereoresolution may be limited by (1) the smallest useful correlation window in the visual system, and (2) a matching process that estimates the disparity of image patches and assumes that disparity is constant across the patch. Both properties are observed in disparity-selective neurons in area V1 of the primate (Nienborg et al., 2004).

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14999059      PMCID: PMC6730432          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-02.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  53 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual Discomfort and the Temporal Properties of the Vergence-Accommodation Conflict.

Authors:  Joohwan Kim; David Kane; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-09

3.  Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-18       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Key characteristics of specular stereo.

Authors:  Alexander A Muryy; Roland W Fleming; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Geunyoung Yoon; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.