Literature DB >> 29987008

Picture perception reveals mental geometry of 3D scene inferences.

Erin Koch1, Famya Baig1, Qasim Zaidi2.   

Abstract

Pose estimation of objects in real scenes is critically important for biological and machine visual systems, but little is known of how humans infer 3D poses from 2D retinal images. We show unexpectedly remarkable agreement in the 3D poses different observers estimate from pictures. We further show that all observers apply the same inferential rule from all viewpoints, utilizing the geometrically derived back-transform from retinal images to actual 3D scenes. Pose estimations are altered by a fronto-parallel bias, and by image distortions that appear to tilt the ground plane. We used pictures of single sticks or pairs of joined sticks taken from different camera angles. Observers viewed these from five directions, and matched the perceived pose of each stick by rotating an arrow on a horizontal touchscreen. The projection of each 3D stick to the 2D picture, and then onto the retina, is described by an invertible trigonometric expression. The inverted expression yields the back-projection for each object pose, camera elevation, and observer viewpoint. We show that a model that uses the back-projection, modulated by just two free parameters, explains 560 pose estimates per observer. By considering changes in retinal image orientations due to position and elevation of limbs, the model also explains perceived limb poses in a complex scene of two bodies lying on the ground. The inferential rules simply explain both perceptual invariance and dramatic distortions in poses of real and pictured objects, and show the benefits of incorporating projective geometry of light into mental inferences about 3D scenes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D scene understanding; mental geometry; picture perception; pose estimation; projective geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29987008      PMCID: PMC6065005          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804873115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Perspective-based illusory movement in a flat billboard--an explanation.

Authors:  Thomas V Papathomas; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes.

Authors:  Bruce C Hansen; Edward A Essock
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Three-dimensional shape from non-homogeneous textures: carved and stretched surfaces.

Authors:  Andrea Li; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-18       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Virtual slant explains perceived slant, distortion, and motion in pictorial scenes.

Authors:  Casper J Erkelens
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual perception as retrospective Bayesian decoding from high- to low-level features.

Authors:  Stephanie Ding; Christopher J Cueva; Misha Tsodyks; Ning Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The perceptual basis of common photographic practice.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Elise A Piazza; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The lawful imprecision of human surface tilt estimation in natural scenes.

Authors:  Seha Kim; Johannes Burge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mental geometry of three-dimensional size perception.

Authors:  Akihito Maruya; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Mental geometry of perceiving 3D size in pictures.

Authors:  Akihito Maruya; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.