Literature DB >> 6850004

Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation.

K A Stevens.   

Abstract

A specific form for the internal representation of local surface orientation is proposed, which is similar to Gibson's (1950) "amount and direction of slant". Slant amount is usually quantified by the angle sigma between the surface normal and the line of sight (0 degrees less than or equal to sigma less than or equal to 90 degrees). Slant direction corresponds to the direction of the gradient of distance from the viewer to the surface, and may be defined by the image direction tau to which the surface normal would project (0 degrees less than or equal to tau less than or equal to 360 degrees). Since the direction of slant is specified by the tilt of the projected surface normal, it is referred to as surface tilt (Stevens, 1979; Marr, 1982). The two degrees of freedom of orientation are therefore quantified by slant, an angle measured perpendicular to the image plane, and tilt, an angle measured in the image plane. The slant-tilt form provides several computational advantages relative to some other proposals and is consistent with various psychological phenomena. Slant might be encoded by various means, e.g. by the cosine of the angle, by the tangent, or linearly by the angle itself. Experimental results are reported that suggest that slant is encoded by an internal parameter that varies linearly with slant angle, with resolution of roughly one part in 100. Thus we propose that surface orientation is encoded in human vision by two quantities, one varying linearly with slant angle, the other varying linearly with tilt angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6850004     DOI: 10.1007/bf00336800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  18 in total

1.  Early processing of visual information.

Authors:  D Marr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1976-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  INTERACTION OF FORM AND EXPOSURE TIME IN THE PERCEPTION OF SLANT.

Authors:  A H SMITH
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1965-04

3.  The perception of visual surfaces.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-07

4.  Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis.

Authors:  K Nakayama; J M Loomis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception.

Authors:  H R Flock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Theory of edge detection.

Authors:  D Marr; E Hildreth
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-02-29

7.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image.

Authors:  H C Longuet-Higgins; K Prazdny
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-17

8.  Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable.

Authors:  K A Stevens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-03

9.  The information content of texture gradients.

Authors:  K A Stevens
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant.

Authors:  P K Kaiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-11
View more
  26 in total

1.  Surface perception in pictures.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn; A M Kappers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Estimation of 3D shape from image orientations.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming; Daniel Holtmann-Rice; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Ahna R Girshick; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-18       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The influence of shape cues on the perception of lighting direction.

Authors:  James P O'Shea; Maneesh Agrawala; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparisons.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn; A M Kappers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

6.  Perception of local orientation from shaded images.

Authors:  F E Pollick; H Watanabe; M Kawato
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

7.  Gravity influences the visual representation of object tilt in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Ari Rosenberg; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Colour, contours, shading and shape: flow interactions reveal anchor neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Benjamin Kunsberg; Daniel Holtmann-Rice; Emma Alexander; Steven Cholewiak; Roland Fleming; Steven W Zucker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Integration of texture and disparity cues to surface slant in dorsal visual cortex.

Authors:  Aidan P Murphy; Hiroshi Ban; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model.

Authors:  M R Turner; G L Gerstein; R Bajcsy
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.