AIMS: To compare monoscopic and stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc using novel software for the digital stereoscopic analysis of optic disc stereopairs. METHODS: Software was developed for the stereoscopic display of digital optic disc images using an interlaced display method. Neuroretinal rim width was determined at 10 degree intervals around the optic disc using a custom (stereoscopic) cursor whose depth was adjusted to that of Elschnig's rim. Measurements were taken, first viewing the disc monoscopically and at a separate sitting, stereoscopically. RESULTS: Measurements were made in 35 eyes from 35 patients (1260 estimates for each observer) using three observers. The mean cup to disc ratio (CDR) ranged from 0.57 to 0.66 (SD 0.13-0.14) for monoscopic viewing compared with 0.64 to 0.69 (SD 0.12-0.14) for stereoscopic viewing. Stereoscopic assessments gave higher CDRs in temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior aspects of the optic disc (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Agreement between observers in estimating CDR was high for monoscopic assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 (CI 0.72 to 0.76) increasing to 0.80 (0.78 to 0.82) for stereoscopic assessment. CONCLUSION: Digital stereoscopic optic disc assessment provides lower estimates of neuroretinal rim width and higher levels of interobserver agreement compared with monoscopic assessments.
AIMS: To compare monoscopic and stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc using novel software for the digital stereoscopic analysis of optic disc stereopairs. METHODS: Software was developed for the stereoscopic display of digital optic disc images using an interlaced display method. Neuroretinal rim width was determined at 10 degree intervals around the optic disc using a custom (stereoscopic) cursor whose depth was adjusted to that of Elschnig's rim. Measurements were taken, first viewing the disc monoscopically and at a separate sitting, stereoscopically. RESULTS: Measurements were made in 35 eyes from 35 patients (1260 estimates for each observer) using three observers. The mean cup to disc ratio (CDR) ranged from 0.57 to 0.66 (SD 0.13-0.14) for monoscopic viewing compared with 0.64 to 0.69 (SD 0.12-0.14) for stereoscopic viewing. Stereoscopic assessments gave higher CDRs in temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior aspects of the optic disc (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Agreement between observers in estimating CDR was high for monoscopic assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 (CI 0.72 to 0.76) increasing to 0.80 (0.78 to 0.82) for stereoscopic assessment. CONCLUSION: Digital stereoscopic optic disc assessment provides lower estimates of neuroretinal rim width and higher levels of interobserver agreement compared with monoscopic assessments.
Authors: D S Kamal; A C Viswanathan; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; C Bunce Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-05
Authors: J C Mwanza; D S Grover; D L Budenz; L W Herndon; W Nolan; J Whiteside-de Vos; G Hay-Smith; J R Bandi; K A Bhansali; L A Forbes; W J Feuer; K Barton Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Wishal D Ramdas; Leonieke M E van Koolwijk; M Kamran Ikram; Nomdo M Jansonius; Paulus T V M de Jong; Arthur A B Bergen; Aaron Isaacs; Najaf Amin; Yurii S Aulchenko; Roger C W Wolfs; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; Ben A Oostra; Andre G Uitterlinden; Pirro Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; Hans G Lemij; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Cornelia M van Duijn Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Nicole J Van Bergen; Jonathan G Crowston; Lisa S Kearns; Sandra E Staffieri; Alex W Hewitt; Amy C Cohn; David A Mackey; Ian A Trounce Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maged S Habib; James A Lowell; Nick S Holliman; Andrew Hunter; Daniella Vaideanu; Anthony Hildreth; David Hw Steel Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Fatima Kyari; Gabriel Entekume; Mansur Rabiu; Paul Spry; Richard Wormald; Winifred Nolan; Gudlavalleti V S Murthy; Clare E Gilbert Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 2.209