Literature DB >> 15965171

Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis.

J E Morgan1, N J L Sheen, R V North, Y Choong, E Ansari.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare monoscopic and stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc using novel software for the digital stereoscopic analysis of optic disc stereopairs.
METHODS: Software was developed for the stereoscopic display of digital optic disc images using an interlaced display method. Neuroretinal rim width was determined at 10 degree intervals around the optic disc using a custom (stereoscopic) cursor whose depth was adjusted to that of Elschnig's rim. Measurements were taken, first viewing the disc monoscopically and at a separate sitting, stereoscopically.
RESULTS: Measurements were made in 35 eyes from 35 patients (1260 estimates for each observer) using three observers. The mean cup to disc ratio (CDR) ranged from 0.57 to 0.66 (SD 0.13-0.14) for monoscopic viewing compared with 0.64 to 0.69 (SD 0.12-0.14) for stereoscopic viewing. Stereoscopic assessments gave higher CDRs in temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior aspects of the optic disc (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Agreement between observers in estimating CDR was high for monoscopic assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 (CI 0.72 to 0.76) increasing to 0.80 (0.78 to 0.82) for stereoscopic assessment.
CONCLUSION: Digital stereoscopic optic disc assessment provides lower estimates of neuroretinal rim width and higher levels of interobserver agreement compared with monoscopic assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965171      PMCID: PMC1772709          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.046169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  26 in total

Review 1.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  J B Jonas; W M Budde; S Panda-Jonas
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera.

Authors:  B Parkin; G Shuttleworth; M Costen; C Davison
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Observer variability in optic disc assessment: implications for glaucoma shared care.

Authors:  R Harper; B Reeves; G Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Diagnosis of early glaucoma with flicker comparisons of serial disc photographs.

Authors:  A Heijl; B Bengtsson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; N R Miller; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The area of the neuroretinal rim of the optic nerve in normal eyes.

Authors:  R J Britton; S M Drance; M Schulzer; G R Douglas; D K Mawson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis.

Authors:  R A Harrad; S P McKee; R Blake; Y Yang
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma.

Authors:  D S Kamal; A C Viswanathan; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; C Bunce
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  13 in total

1.  Glaucomatous progression in series of stereoscopic photographs and Heidelberg retina tomograph images.

Authors:  Neil O'Leary; David P Crabb; Steven L Mansberger; Brad Fortune; Michael D Twa; Michael J Lloyd; Aachal Kotecha; David F Garway-Heath; George A Cioffi; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Utility of digital stereo images for optic disc evaluation.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Gui-Shuang Ying; Denise J Pearson; Mayank Bansal; Manika Puri; Eydie Miller; Judith Alexander; Jody Piltz-Seymour; William Nyberg; Maureen G Maguire; Jayan Eledath; Harpreet Sawhney
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of computer software-assisted optic nerve head photoplanimetry.

Authors:  Masaki Tanito; Takeshi Sagara; Michiya Takamatsu; Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Toshiaki Nakagawa; Yasuyuki Fujita; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey.

Authors:  J C Mwanza; D S Grover; D L Budenz; L W Herndon; W Nolan; J Whiteside-de Vos; G Hay-Smith; J R Bandi; K A Bhansali; L A Forbes; W J Feuer; K Barton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.

Authors:  N Devarajan; G S Williams; M Hopes; D O'Sullivan; D Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  A genome-wide association study of optic disc parameters.

Authors:  Wishal D Ramdas; Leonieke M E van Koolwijk; M Kamran Ikram; Nomdo M Jansonius; Paulus T V M de Jong; Arthur A B Bergen; Aaron Isaacs; Najaf Amin; Yurii S Aulchenko; Roger C W Wolfs; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; Ben A Oostra; Andre G Uitterlinden; Pirro Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; Hans G Lemij; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation compensation may preserve vision in patients with OPA1-linked autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

Authors:  Nicole J Van Bergen; Jonathan G Crowston; Lisa S Kearns; Sandra E Staffieri; Alex W Hewitt; Amy C Cohn; David A Mackey; Ian A Trounce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen - experimental study.

Authors:  Maged S Habib; James A Lowell; Nick S Holliman; Andrew Hunter; Daniella Vaideanu; Anthony Hildreth; David Hw Steel
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Software-Assisted Depth Analysis of Optic Nerve Stereoscopic Images in Telemedicine.

Authors:  Tian Xia; Shriji N Patel; Ben C Szirth; Anton M Kolomeyer; Albert S Khouri
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2016-04-14

10.  A Population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey.

Authors:  Fatima Kyari; Gabriel Entekume; Mansur Rabiu; Paul Spry; Richard Wormald; Winifred Nolan; Gudlavalleti V S Murthy; Clare E Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.