Literature DB >> 20457976

Glaucomatous progression in series of stereoscopic photographs and Heidelberg retina tomograph images.

Neil O'Leary1, David P Crabb, Steven L Mansberger, Brad Fortune, Michael D Twa, Michael J Lloyd, Aachal Kotecha, David F Garway-Heath, George A Cioffi, Chris A Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare optic disc changes using automated analysis of Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) images with assessments, by glaucoma specialists, of change in stereoscopic photographs.
METHODS: Baseline and follow-up stereophotographs and corresponding HRT I series of 91 eyes from 56 patients were selected. The selection criteria were sufficiently long, good-quality HRT series (7 visits in > or =70 months of follow-up) and follow-up photographs contemporaneous with the final HRT image. Topographic change analysis (TCA), statistic image mapping (SIM), and linear regression of rim area (RALR) across time were applied to HRT series. Glaucomatous change determined from stereophotographs by expert observers was used as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Expert observers identified 33 eyes (36%) as exhibiting glaucomatous change. Altering HRT progression criteria such that 36% of eyes progressed according to each method resulted in concordance between HRT methods and stereophotograph assessment of 54% for TCA, 65% for SIM, and 67% for RALR (Cohen kappa = 0.05, 0.23, and 0.30, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curves of the HRT analyses revealed poor precision of HRT analyses to predict stereophotograph-assessed change: areas under the curve were 0.61 for TCA, 0.62 for SIM, and 0.66 for RALR.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistical methods for detecting structural changes in HRT images exhibit only moderate agreement with each other and have poor agreement with expert-assessed change in optic disc stereophotographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457976      PMCID: PMC3073138          DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  50 in total

1.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph.

Authors:  L M Zangwill; C Bowd; C C Berry; J Williams; E Z Blumenthal; C A Sánchez-Galeana; C Vasile; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Optimizing and validating an approach for identifying glaucomatous change in optic nerve topography.

Authors:  James C H Tan; Roger A Hitchings
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Improving the repeatability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II rim area measurements.

Authors:  N G Strouthidis; E T White; V M F Owen; T A Ho; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Age-related decline of disc rim area in visually normal subjects.

Authors:  C S Tsai; R Ritch; D H Shin; J Y Wan; T Chi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick; J B Rogers
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma.

Authors:  D S Kamal; A C Viswanathan; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; C Bunce
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Nicolaas J Reus; Maartje de Graaf; Hans G Lemij
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; D P Crabb; A I McNaught; M C Westcott; D Kamal; D F Garway-Heath; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.

Authors:  Tessa Fayers; Nicholas G Strouthidis; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  17 in total

1.  Influence of clinically invisible, but optical coherence tomography detected, optic disc margin anatomy on neuroretinal rim evaluation.

Authors:  Alexandre S C Reis; Neil O'Leary; Hongli Yang; Glen P Sharpe; Marcelo T Nicolela; Claude F Burgoyne; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Longitudinal detection of optic nerve head changes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Lin He; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  In vivo imaging methods to assess glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Brad Fortune
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Learning from healthy and stable eyes: A new approach for detection of glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Akram Belghith; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Discrepancy between optic disc and nerve fiber layer assessment and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Jong Rak Lee; Kyung Rim Sung; Jung Hwa Na; Kilhwan Shon; Kyoung Sub Lee
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Glaucoma progression detection using nonlocal Markov random field prior.

Authors:  Akram Belghith; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-29

9.  Features of optic disc progression in patients with ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael J Lloyd; Steven L Mansberger; Brad A Fortune; Hau Nguyen; Rodrigo Torres; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; George A Cioffi
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Agreement in identification of glaucomatous progression between the optic disc photography and Heidelberg retina tomography in young glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  Paraskeva Hentova-Sencanic; Ivan Sencanic; Goran Trajković; Marija Bozic; Nevena Bjelovic
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.