Literature DB >> 20966973

The Carmarthenshire Glaucoma Referral Refinement Scheme, a safe and efficient screening service.

N Devarajan1, G S Williams, M Hopes, D O'Sullivan, D Jones.   

Abstract

AIM: It has been previously shown that community refinement of glaucoma referrals is an efficient way to investigate and treat glaucoma suspects. The potential for false negatives has not been explored previously and we describe a scheme in which effort has been made to both assess and control for this, and report on its success.
METHODS: Trained optometrists were recruited to examine and investigate the patients referred with suspected glaucoma, with a view to decreasing false-positive rates in accordance with an agreed protocol. The randomly selected notes of 100 patients referred onward to the Hospital Eye Service (HES) by trained, accredited optometrists, and the notes and optic disc images of 100 randomly selected patients retained in the community were examined in order to determine the efficiency and safety of the scheme.
RESULTS: The scheme resulted in a 53% reduction in the total number of referrals to HES with a cost saving of £117 per patient. Analysis of patients referred resulted in a diagnosis of glaucoma or retention of patients in HES with suspected glaucoma in 83% and a good correlation between the hospital and optometric measurements. Analysis of notes and optic nerve images of patients not referred indicated no compromise on patient safety.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that suspected glaucoma can be successfully refined in the community with benefits to both the patient and the hospital. We also suggest that such a scheme may be safe as well as cost-effective, a conclusion that has not as yet been reached by any other study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20966973      PMCID: PMC3144643          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  14 in total

Review 1.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys.

Authors:  Paul J Foster; Ralf Buhrmann; Harry A Quigley; Gordon J Johnson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?

Authors:  S A Vernon; G Ghosh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Population-based screening versus case detection.

Authors:  Ravi Thomas; Rajul Parikh; Padma Paul; Jayprakash Muliyil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Efficiency of referral for suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  M W Tuck; R P Crick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-27

5.  Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis.

Authors:  J E Morgan; N J L Sheen; R V North; Y Choong; E Ansari
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Screening for open angle glaucoma: systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Rodolfo Hernández; Kannaiyan Rabindranath; Cynthia Fraser; Luke Vale; Augusto Azuara Blanco; Jennifer M Burr
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2008 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  D B Henson; A F Spencer; R Harper; E J Cadman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: study design.

Authors:  I C Spencer; P G Spry; S F Gray; I A Baker; M J Menage; D L Easty; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland.

Authors:  M Coffey; A Reidy; R Wormald; W X Xian; L Wright; P Courtney
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  10 in total

1.  How to defuse a demographic time bomb: the way forward?

Authors:  J C Buchan; W Amoaku; B Barnes; A Cassels-Brown; B Y Chang; J Harcourt; D Shickle; A F Spencer; S A Vernon; C MacEwen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A technician-delivered 'virtual clinic' for triaging low-risk glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  A Kotecha; J Brookes; P J Foster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future?

Authors:  S Trikha; C Macgregor; M Jeffery; J Kirwan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J R Marks; A K Harding; R A Harper; E Williams; S Haque; A F Spencer; C Fenerty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Two-year outcomes of a pilot glaucoma suspect telemedicine monitoring program.

Authors:  Bobeck S Modjtahedi; Katherine Chu; Tiffany Q Luong; Chunyi Hsu; Cynthia Mattox; Paul P Lee; Mamdouh L Nakla; Donald S Fong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-17

6.  The effectiveness of schemes that refine referrals between primary and secondary care--the UK experience with glaucoma referrals: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways Project.

Authors:  Gokulan Ratnarajan; Wendy Newsom; Stephen A Vernon; Cecilia Fenerty; David Henson; Fiona Spencer; Yanfang Wang; Robert Harper; Andrew McNaught; Lisa Collins; Mike Parker; John Lawrenson; Robyn Hudson; Peng Tee Khaw; Richard Wormald; David Garway-Heath; Rupert Bourne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Demographics, referral patterns and management of patients accessing the Welsh Eye Care Service.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Helen Corson; Nik Sheen; Peter Garwood
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Karim El-Assal; Jonathan Foulds; Stuart Dobson; Roshini Sanders
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Factors influencing accuracy of referral and the likelihood of false positive referral by optometrists in Bradford, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Christopher James Davey; Andrew J Scally; Clare Green; Edwin S Mitchell; David B Elliott
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-11-21

10.  Impact of the Manchester Glaucoma Enhanced Referral Scheme on NHS costs.

Authors:  Hannah Forbes; Matt Sutton; David F Edgar; John Lawrenson; Anne Fiona Spencer; Cecilia Fenerty; Robert Harper
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.