Literature DB >> 20505199

Utility of digital stereo images for optic disc evaluation.

Richard A Stone1, Gui-Shuang Ying, Denise J Pearson, Mayank Bansal, Manika Puri, Eydie Miller, Judith Alexander, Jody Piltz-Seymour, William Nyberg, Maureen G Maguire, Jayan Eledath, Harpreet Sawhney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the suitability of digital stereo images for optic disc evaluations in glaucoma.
METHODS: Stereo color optic disc images in both digital and 35-mm slide film formats were acquired contemporaneously from 29 subjects with various cup-to-disc ratios (range, 0.26-0.76; median, 0.475). Using a grading scale designed to assess image quality, the ease of visualizing optic disc features important for glaucoma diagnosis, and the comparative diameters of the optic disc cup, experienced observers separately compared the primary digital stereo images to each subject's 35-mm slides, to scanned images of the same 35-mm slides, and to grayscale conversions of the digital images. Statistical analysis accounted for multiple gradings and comparisons and also assessed image formats under monoscopic viewing.
RESULTS: Overall, the quality of primary digital color images was judged superior to that of 35-mm slides (P < 0.001), including improved stereo (P < 0.001), but the primary digital color images were mostly equivalent to the scanned digitized images of the same slides. Color seemingly added little to grayscale optic disc images, except that peripapillary atrophy was best seen in color (P < 0.0001); both the nerve fiber layer (P < 0.0001) and the paths of blood vessels on the optic disc (P < 0.0001) were best seen in grayscale. The preference for digital over film images was maintained under monoscopic viewing conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital stereo optic disc images are useful for evaluating the optic disc in glaucoma and allow the application of advanced image processing applications. Grayscale images, by providing luminance distinct from color, may be informative for assessing certain features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505199      PMCID: PMC3061503          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

1.  A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements.

Authors:  G N Shuttleworth; C H Khong; J P Diamond
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera.

Authors:  B Parkin; G Shuttleworth; M Costen; C Davison
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center.

Authors:  William J Feuer; Richard K Parrish; Joyce C Schiffman; Douglas R Anderson; Donald L Budenz; Maria-Cristina Wells; Ditte J Hess; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film.

Authors:  M T Tennant; M D Greve; C J Rudnisky; T R Hillson; B J Hinz
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael A Kass; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

6.  Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests.

Authors:  Hitomi Saito; Tae Tsutsumi; Aiko Iwase; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs.

Authors:  Thierry Zeyen; Stefano Miglior; Norbert Pfeiffer; Jose Cunha-Vaz; Ingrid Adamsons
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: is digital imaging as good as 35-mm film?

Authors:  Redmer van Leeuwen; Usha Chakravarthy; Johannes R Vingerling; Corina Brussee; Ada J Hooghart; Paul G Mulder; Paulus T V M de Jong
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.

Authors:  Danny Y Lin; Mark S Blumenkranz; Rosemary J Brothers; David M Grosvenor
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?

Authors:  Hendrik P N Scholl; Samantha S Dandekar; Tunde Peto; Catey Bunce; Wen Xing; Sharon Jenkins; Alan C Bird
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of education on the assessment of optic nerve head photographs for the glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Sabina Andersson; Anders Heijl; Andreas G Boehm; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Morphometric Optic Nerve Head Analysis in Glaucoma Patients: A Comparison between the Simultaneous Nonmydriatic Stereoscopic Fundus Camera (Kowa Nonmyd WX3D) and the Heidelberg Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (HRT III).

Authors:  Siegfried Mariacher; Stephanie Hipp; Robert Wirthky; Gunnar Blumenstock; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Focke Ziemssen; Ulrich Schiefer; Bogomil Voykov; Kai Januschowski
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.909

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.