Literature DB >> 7936972

Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis.

R A Harrad1, S P McKee, R Blake, Y Yang.   

Abstract

Does the shift from binocular rivalry to fusion or stereopsis take time? We measured stereoacuity after rivalry suppression of one half-image of a stereoacuity line target. After the observer signalled that the single stereo half-image had been suppressed, the other half-image was presented for a variable duration. Stereoacuity thresholds were elevated for 150-200 ms. A control experiment demonstrated that the threshold elevation was due to rivalry suppression per se, rather than masking effects associated with the rivalry-inducing target. Monocular Vernier thresholds, measured as the smallest identifiable abrupt shift in the upper line of an aligned Vernier target that had previously been suppressed by rivalry, were elevated for a much longer duration. This result shows that an appropriately matched stereo pair can break rivalry suppression more easily than can monocular changes in position. With the aid of a similar paradigm, we also measured the duration needed to detect a disparate feature in a random-dot stereogram after rivalry suppression of one half-image of the stereogram. Observers could correctly identify the location of the disparate feature (upper or lower visual field) when the other half-image was presented for a duration ranging from 150-650 ms. In the absence of the matching half-image, the first half-image was suppressed by the rival target for a far longer duration (a few seconds). These findings show that although stereopsis and fusion terminate rivalry, both are initially disrupted for a few hundred milliseconds by rivalry suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7936972     DOI: 10.1068/p230015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis.

Authors:  J E Morgan; N J L Sheen; R V North; Y Choong; E Ansari
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Adriana Ferreira; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.

Authors:  Guillaume Riesen; Anthony M Norcia; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  How simultaneous is the perception of binocular depth and rivalry in plaid stimuli?

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-09

7.  Stereoscopic Depth Perception during Binocular Rivalry.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; David Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance.

Authors:  Vassilis Pelekanos; Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Spatial-frequency dependent binocular imbalance in amblyopia.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Emily Wiecek; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Binocular temporal visual processing in myopia.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex; Adriana Ferreira; Anna Kosovicheva
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.