Literature DB >> 15905969

[In-vitro study of the cellular response of human fibroblasts cultured on alloplastic hernia meshes. Influence of mesh material and structure].

C Langer1, P Schwartz, P Krause, H Mohammadi, B Kulle, A Schaper, L Füzesi, H Becker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biocompatibility of meshes in hernia surgery seems to be influenced markedly by the amount of the selected material and its structure. Fibroblasts play a major key role during the process of mesh incorporation. This study was performed to investigate differences in cell morphology and proliferation of human fibroblasts cultured on different polypropylene meshes.
METHODS: In the present in vitro study the cellular response of human fibroblasts was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), comparing three different polypropylene meshes: a newly constructed low-weight and microporous mesh (NK1), a low-weight and macroporous mesh with absorbable polyglactin filaments (Vypro), and a heavy-weight and microporous mesh (BiomeshP1). Human fibroblasts (1,5.10(5) cells) were incubated with the meshes (each 12 mm(2)) for 6 hours, 5 days, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks. Computer-assisted morphometry of the fibroblast/mesh surface ratio served to reflect the biological cell response.
RESULTS: The Vypro mesh showed the significantly highest fibroblast density during the first 6 weeks, but cell growth was nearly exclusively limited to the polyglactin filaments. At 3 months, after reabsorption of the polyglactin, the fibroblast-coated polypropylene mesh surface was only 50% compared to NK1 and BiomeshP1. The morphologic aspect of the fibroblasts on the BiomeshP1 mesh was much more degenerative and unphysiological, compared to NK1 and Vypro, with isolated, single cells instead of a broad, connective growth. The BiomeshP1 showed a significantly higher fibroblast proliferation around the nodes of the mesh compared to the straight filaments. On the NK1 mesh fibroblasts exclusively proliferated on the filaments but not on the pressed mesh surface.
CONCLUSIONS: The polymer surface and structure appears to be of major importance for the biocompatibility of meshes: human fibroblasts preferably grow on low-weight meshes, thin filaments, and mesh nodes. Heavy-weight meshes induce degenerative cell reactions. Polyglactin seems to further improve cell proliferation whereas a pressed mesh surface without pores hinders fibroblast growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15905969     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1036-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  A J Singer; R A Clark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias].

Authors:  V Schumpelick; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; U Klinge
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Foreign body reactions to monofilament and braided polypropylene mesh used as preperitoneal implants in pigs.

Authors:  G L Beets; P M Go; H van Mameren
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-10

4.  Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin.

Authors:  I V Yannas; E Lee; D P Orgill; E M Skrabut; G F Murphy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  [Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans].

Authors:  B Klosterhalfen; U Klinge; B Hermanns; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  F H Greca; J B de Paula; M L Biondo-Simões; F D da Costa; A P da Silva; S Time; A Mansur
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  [Mesh-plasty for recurrent abdominal wall hernias--results].

Authors:  K H Vestweber; F Lepique; F Haaf; M Horatz; A Rink
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.942

8.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; A Schachtrupp; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.745

10.  Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair.

Authors:  V Schumpelick; U Klinge; K Junge; M Stumpf
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  U Klinge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Comparison of a lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® LP) and a large-pore knitted PTFE mesh (GORE® INFINIT® mesh)--Biocompatibility in a standardized endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia model.

Authors:  Dietmar A Jacob; Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Effects of mesenchymal stem cell and fibroblast coating on immunogenic potential of prosthetic meshes in vitro.

Authors:  Yue Gao; David M Krpata; Cory N Criss; Lijia Liu; Natasza Posielski; Michael J Rosen; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  In-vitro examination of the biocompatibility of fibroblast cell lines on alloplastic meshes and sterilized polyester mosquito mesh.

Authors:  R Wiessner; T Kleber; N Ekwelle; K Ludwig; D-U Richter
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Rare late mesh complications following inguinal prolene hernia system hernioplasty: report of three cases.

Authors:  Marinko Zuvela; Zoran Krivokapic; Danijel Galun; Velimir Markovic
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  [Mesh shrinkage in hernia surgery: data from a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical study].

Authors:  C Langer; H Forster; F Konietschke; B-W Raab; A Schaper; E Brunner; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Feasibility of primary inguinal hernia repair with a new mesh.

Authors:  L Fei; G Filippone; V Trapani; D Cuttitta; E Iannuzzi; M Iannuzzi; G Galizia; F Moccia; G Signoriello
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Coating with autologous plasma improves biocompatibility of mesh grafts in vitro: development stage of a surgical innovation.

Authors:  Holger Gerullis; Evangelos Georgas; Christoph Eimer; Christian Arndt; Dimitri Barski; Bernhard Lammers; Bernd Klosterhalfen; Mihaly Borós; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.