Literature DB >> 11505649

The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs.

F H Greca1, J B de Paula, M L Biondo-Simões, F D da Costa, A P da Silva, S Time, A Mansur.   

Abstract

Two types of monofilament polypropylene meshes of markedly different construction, configuration and pore size were compared and used to repair full-thickness muscle defects in the abdominal wall of 22 mongrel dogs to assess their biocompatibility with host tissues. The defects were repaired with Prolene (Ethicon) woven mesh (pore size = 164 x 96 microns) and with an experimental, extruded mesh called T mesh (pore size = 3 mm x 4 mm). On the 30th postoperative day, the animals were sacrificed, and the segments of the abdominal wall containing the implanted meshes were excised. Although the Prolene mesh had greater tensile strength before implantation, 30 days after implantation, the T mesh showed similar tensile strength to Prolene mesh. The collagen densitometry showed a significant increase of total and mature collagen type I deposition in the T mesh. This suggests that the increased mature collagen type I deposition significantly increases the tensile strength of the reinforced mesh tissue and that the larger pore in the T mesh contributed to this finding by allowing increasing fibber orientation within the pores as a result of in vivo tension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11505649     DOI: 10.1007/s100290100001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  38 in total

1.  Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes.

Authors:  R R M Vogels; K W Y van Barneveld; J W A M Bosmans; G Beets; M J J Gijbels; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Corey R Deeken; Michael S Abdo; Margaret M Frisella; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Histological studies of monofilament and multifilament polypropylene mesh implants demonstrate equivalent penetration of macrophages between fibrils.

Authors:  John Papadimitriou; Peter Petros
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Inge Schmitz; Orlin Belyaev; Robert Grabs; Klaus-Michael Müller; Waldemar Uhl; Volker Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; F Sommerer; A Tannapfel; H Lippert; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Does the additional application of a polylactide film (SurgiWrap) to a lightweight mesh (TiMesh) reduce adhesions after laparoscopic intraperitoneal implantation procedures? Experimental results obtained with the laparoscopic porcine model.

Authors:  Christine Schug-Pass; Florian Sommerer; Andrea Tannapfel; Hans Lippert; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; R Fortelny; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  The influence of porosity on the integration histology of two polypropylene meshes for the treatment of abdominal wall defects in dogs.

Authors:  F H Greca; Z A Souza-Filho; A Giovanini; M R Rubin; R F Kuenzer; F B Reese; L M Araujo
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.