Literature DB >> 10663001

[Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans].

B Klosterhalfen1, U Klinge, B Hermanns, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

The widespread use of alloplastic materials as the standard procedure for hernia repair makes an evaluation of the long-term integration of these implants imperative. A total of 121 explanted meshes (mean implantation time 23.2 & 19.7 months) of polypropylene (Atrium((R)), n = 20; Marlex((R)), n = 50; Prolene((R)), n = 21), Polyester (Mersilene((R)), n = 19) and PTFE (Gore-Tex((R)), n = 11) were analyzed in regard to the tissue and cell response within the interface mesh-fiber/tissue. The mesh samples were investigated by light and electronmicroscopy, as well as immunohistochemistry. The morphometric results confirmed a persisting inflammatory proliferative foreign-body reaction with increased cell turnover in the recipient tissues. This reaction is mainly influenced by the selected mesh modification. The consequences of the arising "chronic wound" are discussed in detail, in particular with regard to possible malignant transformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10663001     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  44 in total

1.  Does every hernia demand a mesh repair? A critical review.

Authors:  V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Impact of endoscopic and histological evaluations of two different types of mesh plug for a groin hernia model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Mandai; Minoru Naito; Tatsuro Hayashi; Hiroaki Asano; Hideo Ino; Kazunori Tsukuda; Shinichiro Miyoshi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Comparative investigation of alloplastic materials for hernia repair with improved methodology.

Authors:  M Kapischke; K Prinz; J Tepel; J Tensfeldt; T Schulz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Incisional hernia: challenge of re-operations after mesh repair.

Authors:  Joachim Conze; Carsten J Krones; Volker Schumpelick; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Loïc Boulanger; Malik Boukerrou; Chrystèle Rubod; Pierre Collinet; A Fruchard; René J Courcol; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

8.  Is there a risk of infertility after inguinal mesh repair? Experimental studies in the pig and the rabbit.

Authors:  Christian Peiper; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge; Eva Strehlau; A Ottinger; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Basic science and clinical aspects of mesh infection in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Vincent Letouzey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Petra Lynen Jansen; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.