Literature DB >> 10354839

[Minimized polypropylene mesh for preperitoneal net plasty (PNP) of incisional hernias].

V Schumpelick1, B Klosterhalfen, M Müller, U Klinge.   

Abstract

Repair of incisional hernias requires the extensive implantation of alloplastic materials. The extent of the scar tissue is markedly regulated by the amount and structure of the incorporated material and is responsible for the increased rate of local wound complications. Correspondingly, minimization of the alloplastic implants should be favorable. In a randomized, prospective clinical study, the early results were compared after implantation of either a minimized, low-weight (26.8 g/m2) mesh with a pore size of 5 mm or a common, heavy-weight (90.2 g/m2 polypropylene) mesh with a pore size of 0.8 mm. Indicators for clinical suitability were the rate and volume of seroma, subjective paraesthesia, physical capability, abdominal wall compliance, and the histologically analyzed tissue reaction of samples removed on the occasion of revision operations. As result, the optimized, low-weight mesh showed a remarkable decrease in the rate of seroma, patient complaints, less restriction of abdominal wall mobility, and improved abdominal wall compliance as verified by 3D stereography. These clinical findings corresponded to a pronounced decrease in inflammation and scar reaction, indicating improved incorporation of the alloplastic material. No other major complications except for one recurrence have been found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10354839     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  35 in total

1.  Does every hernia demand a mesh repair? A critical review.

Authors:  V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.

Authors:  G Pascual; M Rodríguez; S Sotomayor; B Pérez-Köhler; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Which mesh for hernia repair?

Authors:  C N Brown; J G Finch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Incisional hernia: open techniques.

Authors:  Uwe Klinge; Joachim Conze; Carsten J Krones; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  [New aspects in hernia surgery].

Authors:  B J Lammers; P E Goretzki; T Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Inge Schmitz; Orlin Belyaev; Robert Grabs; Klaus-Michael Müller; Waldemar Uhl; Volker Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Treatment of abdominal wall defects, including abdominal relaxation].

Authors:  C Langer; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model.

Authors:  C Schug-Pass; C Tamme; A Tannapfel; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.