Literature DB >> 8934114

Foreign body reactions to monofilament and braided polypropylene mesh used as preperitoneal implants in pigs.

G L Beets1, P M Go, H van Mameren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the foreign body reaction of the monofilament polypropylene (Prolene) mesh, and the multifilament Surgipro mesh. Both types of mesh are widely used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
DESIGN: Prospective experimental study.
SETTING: University hospital, The Netherlands. MATERIAL: Six female Yorkshire & Dutch landway pigs. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic transabdominal implantation of six Surgipro meshes and six Prolene meshes in 12 inguinal sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 3, 6, and 12 weeks after implantation the foreign body reaction was measured by counting multinucleated giant cells at the mesh-tissue interface.
RESULTS: At all times the numbers of multinucleated giant cells at the mesh tissue interface were significantly larger with Surgipro than with Prolene (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significantly more foreign body reaction after implantation of Surgipro than Prolene mesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  16 in total

1.  Erosion, defective healing and extrusion after tension-free urethropexy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Karin Glavind; Pia Sander
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-02-14

2.  Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Kim Fugate; David McClusky; E Matt Ritter; Andrew Lederman; Dirk Dillehay; C Daniel Smith; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Surgipro mesh: not all multifilaments are the same.

Authors:  George T Rodeheaver
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

4.  Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model.

Authors:  Maja L Konstantinovic; Eline Pille; Marta Malinowska; Eric Verbeken; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-10-10

Review 5.  The use of synthetic sub-urethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Andrew Feifer; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04-27

6.  Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Tapio Väyrynen; Marie Ellström Engh; Susanne Axelsen; Christian Falconer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

Review 7.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 8.  The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Fang Zheng; Maja Konstantinovic; Federico Spelzini; Filip Claerhout; Anneke Steensma; Yves Ozog; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

9.  Prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit: prospective study on 70 patients.

Authors:  H Azaïs; C Jean Charles; P Delporte; P Debodinance
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; R Fortelny; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.