Literature DB >> 17219267

Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

U Klinge.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17219267     DOI： 10.1007/s00268-006-0670-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN： 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Influence of polyglactin-coating on functional and morphological parameters of polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; M Müller; M Anurov; A Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  The structure of a biomaterial rather than its chemical composition modulates the repair process at the peritoneal level.

Authors:  Juan M Bellón; Francisca Jurado; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Raquel López; Antonio Carrera-San Martín; Julia Buján
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernd Klosterhalfen; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Inge Schmitz; Orlin Belyaev; Robert Grabs; Klaus-Michael Müller; Waldemar Uhl; Volker Zumtobel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  [In-vitro study of the cellular response of human fibroblasts cultured on alloplastic hernia meshes. Influence of mesh material and structure].

Authors:  C Langer; P Schwartz; P Krause; H Mohammadi; B Kulle; A Schaper; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Birkenhauer; K Junge; J Conze; V Schumpelick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Functional and morphological evaluation of a low-weight, monofilament polypropylene mesh for hernia repair.

Authors:  U Klinge; K Junge; M Stumpf; A P Ottinger AP; B Klosterhalfen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002

8.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

9.  Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.

Authors:  J Conze; R Rosch; U Klinge; C Weiss; M Anurov; S Titkowa; A Oettinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inflammatory reaction and neotissue maturation in the early host tissue incorporation of polypropylene prostheses.

Authors:  G Pascual; M Rodríguez; S Sotomayor; B Pérez-Köhler; J M Bellón
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.

Authors:  Ali Rastegarpour; Michael Cheung; Madhurima Vardhan; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Charles E Butler; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Pre-clinical assay of the tissue integration and mechanical adhesion of several types of cyanoacrylate adhesives in the fixation of lightweight polypropylene meshes for abdominal hernia repair.

Authors:  Gemma Pascual; Claudia Mesa-Ciller; Marta Rodríguez; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Verónica Gómez-Gil; Mar Fernández-Gutiérrez; Julio San Román; Juan M Bellón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.