Literature DB >> 6841814

Do off-frequency simultaneous maskers suppress the signal?

D L Weber.   

Abstract

Psychophysical tuning curves obtained in forward masking show greater tuning than those obtained in simultaneous masking. This difference is often attributed to the contribution of suppression to the masking produced by off-frequency simultaneous maskers. In this experiment, simultaneous-masking tuning curves were obtained using a 195-ms, 1-kHz sinusoidal signal presented at 40 dB SPL. If the maskers identified in this procedure reduce signal detectability by suppressing the response to the signal, then it should be possible to demonstrate suppression effects between stimuli with the parameters of the masker and signal. One conventional method for demonstrating suppression is to show a reduction in the amount of forward masking produced by one stimulus when a second stimulus is added to it. When used to test the effect of the masker upon the signal, this procedure does not show the suppression supposedly produced by the off-frequency maskers. These data are consistent with an alternative explanation involving only excitatory interactions between masker and signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841814     DOI: 10.1121/1.389012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

2.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

3.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Abnormal auditory forward masking pattern in the brainstem response of individuals with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Johan Källstrand; Olle Olsson; Sara Fristedt Nehlstedt; Mia Ling Sköld; Sören Nielzén
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Signal-processing strategy for restoration of cross-channel suppression in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Emily C Bosen; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.