Literature DB >> 19640049

Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility.

Daniel Fogerty1, Diane Kewley-Port.   

Abstract

Although research has focused on the perceptual contribution of consonants to spoken syllable or word intelligibility, in sentences vowels have a distinct perceptual advantage over consonants in determining intelligibility [Kewley-Port et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2365-2375 (2007)]. The current study used a noise replacement paradigm to investigate how perceptual contributions of consonants and vowels are mediated by transitional information at segmental boundaries. The speech signal preserved between replacements is defined as a glimpse window. In the first experiment, glimpse windows contained proportional amounts of transitional boundary information that was either added to consonants or deleted from vowels. Results replicated a two-to-one vowel advantage for intelligibility at the traditional consonant-vowel boundary and suggest that vowel contributions remain robust against proportional deletions of the signal. The second experiment examined the combined effect of random glimpse windows not locked to segments and the distributions of durations measured from the consonant versus vowel glimpses observed in Experiment 1. Results demonstrated that, for random glimpses, the cumulative sentence duration glimpsed was an excellent predictor of performance. Comparisons across experiments confirmed that higher proportions of vowel information within glimpses yielded the highest sentence intelligibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640049      PMCID: PMC2730717          DOI: 10.1121/1.3159302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of time gating and word length on isolated word-recognition performance.

Authors:  C H Craig; B W Kim
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-12

3.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

4.  Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

Review 6.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Vowel discrimination of hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  E Owens; C B Talbott; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-09

8.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-04-14

9.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.

Authors:  W Strange; J J Jenkins; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  C A Sammeth; M F Dorman; C J Stearns
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual weighting of individual and concurrent cues for sentence intelligibility: frequency, envelope, and fine structure.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Perceived Sentence Clarity for Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Shae D Morgan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.