Literature DB >> 3627931

Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

J A Bashford, R M Warren.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3627931     DOI： 10.3758/bf03210499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  An auditory figure-ground effect.

Authors:  W THURLOW
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-12

2.  Auditory continuity and amplitude edges.

Authors:  A S Bregman; G L Dannenbring
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1977-09

3.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  D D Dirks; D Bower
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Passing the strongly voiced components of noisy speech.

Authors:  C M Holloway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise.

Authors:  G L Powers; J C Wilcox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Continuity effects with alternately sounded tone and noise signals.

Authors:  L P Elfner; A Marsella
Journal:  Med Res Eng       Date:  1966
View more
  19 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

4.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of interrupted sentences under conditions of spectral degradation.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Fabiola Peredo; Desirae Nelson; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

8.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.