Literature DB >> 17075701

Electrophysiological validation of a human prototype auditory midbrain implant in a guinea pig model.

Minoo Lenarz1, Hubert H Lim, James F Patrick, David J Anderson, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

The auditory midbrain implant (AMI) is a new treatment for hearing restoration in patients with neural deafness or surgically inaccessible cochleae who cannot benefit from cochlear implants (CI). This includes neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) patients who, due to development and/or removal of vestibular schwannomas, usually experience complete damage of their auditory nerves. Although the auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provides sound awareness and aids lip-reading capabilities for these NF2 patients, it generally only achieves hearing performance levels comparable with a single-channel CI. In collaboration with Cochlear Ltd. (Lane Cove, Australia), we developed a human prototype AMI, which is designed for electrical stimulation along the well-defined tonotopic gradient of the inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICC). Considering that better speech perception and hearing performance has been correlated with a greater number of discriminable frequency channels of information available, the ability of the AMI to effectively activate discrete frequency regions within the ICC may enable better hearing performance than achieved by the ABI. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate if our AMI array could achieve low-threshold, frequency-specific activation within the ICC, and whether the levels for ICC activation via AMI stimulation were within safe limits for human application. We electrically stimulated different frequency regions within the ICC via the AMI array and recorded the corresponding neural activity in the primary auditory cortex (A1) using a multisite silicon probe in ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs. Based on our results, AMI stimulation achieves lower thresholds and more localized, frequency-specific activation than CI stimulation. Furthermore, AMI stimulation achieves cortical activation with current levels that are within safe limits for central nervous system stimulation. This study confirms that our AMI design is sufficient for ensuring safe and effective activation of the ICC, and warrants further studies to translate the AMI into clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075701      PMCID: PMC2504634          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0056-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  57 in total

1.  Organization of binaural excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the inferior colliculus from the superior olive.

Authors:  William C Loftus; Deborah C Bishop; Richard L Saint Marie; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-05-03       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

3.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The neuronal architecture of the human posterior colliculus. A study with the Golgi method.

Authors:  P Geniec; D K Morest
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1971

5.  Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  M M Merzenich; M D Reid
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-09-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The neuronal organization of the inferior colliculus of the adult cat. I. The central nucleus.

Authors:  A J Rockel; E G Jones
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1973-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Some features of the spatial organization of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  G L Roth; L M Aitkin; R A Andersen; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Representation of species-specific vocalizations in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Daniel Suta; Eugen Kvasnák; Jirí Popelár; Josef Syka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Use of a multichannel auditory brainstem implant for neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  Marc S Schwartz; Steven R Otto; Derald E Brackmann; William E Hitselberger; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  Microsurgical approaches to the perimesencephalic cisterns and related segments of the posterior cerebral artery: comparison using a novel application of image guidance.

Authors:  Arthur J Ulm; Necmettin Tanriover; Masatou Kawashima; Alvaro Campero; Frank J Bova; Arthur Rhoton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  15 in total

1.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural integration and enhancement from the inferior colliculus up to different layers of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Straka; Dillon Schendel; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

4.  Response features across the auditory midbrain reveal an organization consistent with a dual lemniscal pathway.

Authors:  Małgorzata M Straka; Samuel Schmitz; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Primary auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the thalamus.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Jonathan Y Shih; Christoph E Schreiner; Steven W Cheung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Behavioral determination of stimulus pair discrimination of auditory acoustic and electrical stimuli using a classical conditioning and heart-rate approach.

Authors:  Simeon J Morgan; Antonio G Paolini
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  [Central auditory prosthesis].

Authors:  T Lenarz; H Lim; G Joseph; G Reuter; M Lenarz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17

10.  Localized cell and drug delivery for auditory prostheses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Hendricks; Jennifer A Chikar; Mark A Crumling; Yehoash Raphael; David C Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.