Literature DB >> 11223296

A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes.

F Rattay1, P Lutter, H Felix.   

Abstract

Differences in neural geometry and the fact that the soma of the human cochlear neuron typically is not myelinated are reasons for disagreements between single fiber recordings in animals and the neural code evoked in cochlear implant patients. We introduce a compartment model of the human cochlear neuron to study the excitation and propagation process of action potentials. The model can be used to predict (i) the points of spike generation, (ii) the time difference between stimulation and the arrival of a spike at the proximal end of the central axon, (iii) the vanishing of peripherally evoked spikes at the soma region under specific conditions, (iv) the influence of electrode positions on spiking behavior, and (v) consequences of the loss of the peripheral axon. Every subunit of the cochlear neuron is separately modeled. Ion channel dynamics are described by a modified Hodgkin--Huxley model. Influence of membrane noise is taken into account. Additionally, the generalized activating function is introduced as a tool to give an envision of the origin of spikes in the peripheral and in the central axon without any knowledge of the gating processes in the active membranes. Comparing the reactions of a human and cat cochlear neuron, we find differences in spiking behavior, e.g. peripherally and centrally evoked spikes arrive with a time difference of about 400 mus in man and 200 mus in cat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11223296     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00256-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  72 in total

1.  Lateral superior olive function in congenital deafness.

Authors:  Kiri Couchman; Andrew Garrett; Adam S Deardorff; Frank Rattay; Susanne Resatz; Robert Fyffe; Bruce Walmsley; Richardson N Leão
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

4.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

6.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

10.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.