Literature DB >> 15464322

Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.

Eberhard Kuon1, Johannes B Dahm, Klaus Empen, Daniel M Robinson, Gereon Reuter, Michael Wucherer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify tube angulations in invasive cardiology, which promise minimal radiation exposure to patients and operators.
BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology is high.
METHODS: We mapped the fluoroscopic dose-area product per second (DAP/s), applied to an anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando phantom and, in absence of radiation protection devices, the mean personal dose in the operator's position in 10 degrees steps from the 100 degrees right anterior oblique (RAO) to the 100 degrees left anterior oblique (LAO) projection, as well as for all geometrically feasible craniocaudal tube angulations.
RESULTS: For our specific setting conditions RAO 20 degrees /0 degrees tube angulation generated the lowest DAP/s and operator's personal dose. The mean patient DAP/s and operator personal dose for all postero-anterior (PA) projections, cranialized and caudalized together, rose significantly: 3.7 and 10.6 times the PA 0 degrees baseline values toward LAO 100 degrees and 3.7 and 2.4 times toward RAO 100 degrees , respectively. Patient and operator values for all PA projections, angulated to the right and left, increased approximately 2.5 times toward 30 degrees craniocaudal angulations. Caudal PA 0 degrees /30 degrees - angulation instead of caudal LAO 60 degrees /20 degrees - angulation for the left coronary main stem and cranial PA 0 degrees /30 degrees + view in place of cranial LAO 60 degrees /20 degrees + view for the left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation enable 2.6-fold dose reductions to the patient and eight- and five-fold dose reductions to the operator, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The PA views and RAO views >or=40 degrees , heretofore unconventional in clinical routine, should be favored over steep LAO projections >or=40 degrees whenever possible. Tube angulations that are radiation intensive to the patient exponentially increase the operator's radiation risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15464322     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of coronary angiographic projections to balance the clinical yield with the radiation risk.

Authors:  I R Smith; J Cameron; K L Mengersen; J T Rivers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  N Journy; S Sinno-Tellier; C Maccia; A Le Tertre; P Pirard; P Pagès; D Eilstein; J Donadieu; O Bar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Efficiency of a minicourse in radiation reducing techniques: a pilot initiative to encourage less irradiating cardiological interventional techniques (ELICIT).

Authors:  E Kuon; K Empen; D M Robinson; A Pfahlberg; O Gefeller; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Comparison of fluoroscopic operator eye exposures when working from femoral region, side, or head of patient.

Authors:  M Jordan Ray; Fawzi Mohammad; William B Taylor; Marco Cura; Clare Savage
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

6.  Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention.

Authors:  Maiy Hamdy El Sayed; Alaa Mahmoud Roushdy; Hala El Farghaly; Ahmad El Sherbini
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  V Sadick; W Reed; L Collins; N Sadick; R Heard; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.

Authors:  E Kuon; J B Dahm; D M Robinson; K Empen; M Günther; W Wucherer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

9.  The lateral plane delivers higher dose than the frontal plane in biplane cardiac catheterization systems.

Authors:  Osamah Aldoss; Sonali Patel; Kyle Harris; Abhay Divekar
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yamagata; Bashar Aldhoon; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.