Literature DB >> 15300399

Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs.

J Sailer1, M Scharitzer, P Peloschek, A Giurea, H Imhof, S Grampp.   

Abstract

The purpose was to assess axial alignment of the lower limb using mechanical axis measurements on conventional and digital radiographs. Total-leg radiographs of 24 patients, 8 male and 16 female, with a mean age of 68.6+/-10.2 years, were performed in a standardized anterior-posterior projection and standing position using a conventional and digital phosphor storage film screen radiography system. Knee joint angulation was assessed by measuring the angle between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the middle of the femoral condyles and a line drawn from the middle of the tibial condyles to the midpoint of the malleolus. On conventional leg radiographs, line drawing and angle measurement were performed manually with a transparent goniometer. Angle measurement on digital leg radiographs was performed on a PACS workstation using computer-assisted measurement software (IMPAX, AGFA-GEVAERT, Belgium). Evaluation time for both measurements was recorded. We diagnosed 14 varus and 10 valgus angulations of the knee joint. The mean individual difference between axis deviation of conventional digital leg radiographs was 0.93+0.6 degrees (min 0 degrees, max 2 degrees), the mean difference in varus angulation was 1.13+/-0.45 degrees (min 0.3 degrees, max 2 degrees), and the mean difference in valgus angulation was 0.65+/-0.71 degrees (min 0 degrees, max 2 degrees). Angle measurements on conventional and digital radiographs did not show any statistically significant difference. Mean time exposure was 4.9 min/patient for manual and 1.08 min/patient for computer-assisted angle measurement (P<0.001). Computer-assisted angle measurement on digital total-leg radiographs represents a reliable method with no significant angle differences compared to conventional radiographic systems and offers a significantly lower evaluation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15300399     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2436-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow.

Authors:  G A May; D D Deer; D Dackiewicz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Developments in digital radiography: an equipment update.

Authors:  J J James; A G Davies; A R Cowen; P J O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology].

Authors:  S Grampp; C Czerny; C Krestan; C Henk; L Heiner; H Imhof
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Angular configuration of the knee. Comparison of conventional measurements and the QUESTOR Precision Radiography system.

Authors:  J Sanfridsson; L Ryd; K Eklund; Y Kouvaras; K Jonsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  An easy linear estimation of the mechanical axis on long-leg radiographs.

Authors:  C M Shearman; E A Brandser; M H Kathol; W A Clark; J J Callaghan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T L Petersen; G A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Roentgenographic assessment of the hip-knee-ankle axis in medial gonarthrosis. A study of reproducibility.

Authors:  S Odenbring; A M Berggren; L Peil
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee.

Authors:  K A Krackow; C L Pepe; E J Galloway
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  19 in total

1.  Correlation of radiographic and navigated measurements of TKA limb alignment: a matter of time?

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; Lukas Konstantinidis; Tobias Baumann; Philipp Niemeyer; Norbert P Suedkamp; Peter Helwig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of PACS and hard-copy 51-inch radiographs for measuring leg length and deformity.

Authors:  Saurabh Khakharia; Daniel Bigman; Austin T Fragomen; Helene Pavlov; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  J D Wilson; W Eardley; S Odak; A Jennings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Reproducibility of computer-assisted joint alignment measurement in OA knee radiographs.

Authors:  A K O Wong; D Inglis; K A Beattie; A Doan; G Ioannidis; J Obeid; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Pre-operative frontal plane malalignment predicts the extension gap asymmetry in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Doerte Matziolis; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS.

Authors:  R G Marx; P Grimm; K A Lillemoe; C M Robertson; O R Ayeni; S Lyman; E A Bogner; H Pavlov
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Inter-observer variability and its correlation to experience in measurement of lower limb mechanical axis on long leg radiographs.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay; Vikas P Birla; Amit Kumar Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-11

8.  Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel PACS integrated computer software program.

Authors:  Eitan Segev; Yoram Hemo; Shlomo Wientroub; Dror Ovadia; Michael Fishkin; David M Steinberg; Shlomo Hayek
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Static knee alignment measurements among Caucasians and African Americans: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Amanda E Nelson; Larissa Braga; Andresa Braga-Baiak; Julius Atashili; Todd A Schwartz; Jordan B Renner; Charles G Helmick; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Reliability of lower limb alignment measures using an established landmark-based method with a customized computer software program.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.