INTRODUCTION: Restoration of mechanical axis (MA) is one of the most important aims of treatment of knee arthritis. The measurement of MA is often done on hip knee ankle (HKA) radiographs (LLR), but its measurement is often difficult and variable. We studied to check if inter-observer variability in the measurement of MA is dependent on the experience of the observer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 48 patients (70 knees) underwent measurement of MA on HKA radiographs. The measurement was done by five observers of different experience. All the results were tested for inter-observer variability. RESULTS: The overall intra-class correlation was 0.70. The two full time consultants had good agreeability among them (p < 0.456). All the surgeons who had less than five years of experience among them also had good agreeability amongst them (all p values >0.005). All the other groups (except senior consultant and senior registrar) had statistically significant difference amongst them (all p values <0.005). CONCLUSION: There is an inter-observer variability in the measurement of MA on the HKA radiographs. The agreeability between the observers increases as the experience of the personnel increases. Although long leg radiographs can be used for assessment for HKA, this variability should be kept in mind while using this as a tool for planning management of the arthritic knee.
INTRODUCTION: Restoration of mechanical axis (MA) is one of the most important aims of treatment of knee arthritis. The measurement of MA is often done on hip knee ankle (HKA) radiographs (LLR), but its measurement is often difficult and variable. We studied to check if inter-observer variability in the measurement of MA is dependent on the experience of the observer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 48 patients (70 knees) underwent measurement of MA on HKA radiographs. The measurement was done by five observers of different experience. All the results were tested for inter-observer variability. RESULTS: The overall intra-class correlation was 0.70. The two full time consultants had good agreeability among them (p < 0.456). All the surgeons who had less than five years of experience among them also had good agreeability amongst them (all p values >0.005). All the other groups (except senior consultant and senior registrar) had statistically significant difference amongst them (all p values <0.005). CONCLUSION: There is an inter-observer variability in the measurement of MA on the HKA radiographs. The agreeability between the observers increases as the experience of the personnel increases. Although long leg radiographs can be used for assessment for HKA, this variability should be kept in mind while using this as a tool for planning management of the arthritic knee.
Entities:
Keywords:
Inter-observer; Long leg radiographs; Mechanical axis; Total knee replacement; Variability
Authors: Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Jerome J DaSilva; Jaques S Milner; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: R G Marx; P Grimm; K A Lillemoe; C M Robertson; O R Ayeni; S Lyman; E A Bogner; H Pavlov Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Johannes Cip; Mark Widemschek; Matthias Luegmair; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Thomas Benesch; Arno Martin Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Payam Tarassoli; Jil A Wood; Darren B Chen; Will Griffiths-Jones; Johan Bellemans; Samuel J MacDessi Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.114