Literature DB >> 8915266

Angular configuration of the knee. Comparison of conventional measurements and the QUESTOR Precision Radiography system.

J Sanfridsson1, L Ryd, K Eklund, Y Kouvaras, K Jonsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the QUESTOR Precision Radiography system (QPR) and to compare it with the routine hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements. The aim was also to evaluate the robustness of the QPR system against the osseous changes of arthrotic disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients, operated on with a high tibial osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis, were examined. The alignment of the leg was measured by the conventional technique and by the QPR method. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The 2 methods correlated well. The intraobserver variation in the QPR measurements was, with the exception of the capito-midcondylar-femoral shaft angle and the tibial plateau width, not affected by the osseous changes inflicted by the arthrotic process. The patients tolerated both systems well while the staff preferred the QPR system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8915266     DOI: 10.1177/02841851960373P243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

1.  Reproducibility of computer-assisted joint alignment measurement in OA knee radiographs.

Authors:  A K O Wong; D Inglis; K A Beattie; A Doan; G Ioannidis; J Obeid; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning.

Authors:  Frederic Paternostre; Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reliability of lower limb alignment measures using an established landmark-based method with a customized computer software program.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sled; Lisa M Sheehy; David T Felson; Patrick A Costigan; Miu Lam; T Derek V Cooke
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  A comparison of five approaches to measurement of anatomic knee alignment from radiographs.

Authors:  G McDaniel; K L Mitchell; C Charles; V B Kraus
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs.

Authors:  J Sailer; M Scharitzer; P Peloschek; A Giurea; H Imhof; S Grampp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Predicting the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle accurately from standard knee radiographs: a cross-validation experiment in 100 patients.

Authors:  Willem Paul Gielis; Hassan Rayegan; Vahid Arbabi; Seyed Y Ahmadi Brooghani; Claudia Lindner; Tim F Cootes; Pim A de Jong; H Weinans; Roel J H Custers
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.