Literature DB >> 21159801

To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems.

J D Wilson1, W Eardley, S Odak, A Jennings.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the reliability of femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) measurements made with the software and images available in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: Using the Centricity Enterprise™ (GE Healthcare Pty Ltd Piscataway, NJ) picture archiving and communication system (PACS), the NSA of the proximal femur was measured from anteroposterior radiographs of adult hips. 3 independent observers, using a standardised technique, performed a total of 120 measurements.
RESULTS: The Pearson's correlation coefficient for the intraobserver agreement was 0.98 (p<0.01) and for interobserver measurements 0.86 (p<0.01). Bland-Altman plots revealed the limits of intraobserver agreement to be ±2.5°, but interobserver limits of agreement to be ±6°. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was also calculated. The interobserver ICC was 0.62 (0.42-0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI); p<0.001). The intraobserver ICC was 0.98 (0.95-0.99, 95% CI; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: PACS software has many advantages, but when using systems that can display angle measurements to one-tenth of a degree caution must be exercised to ensure that reliability of these measurements is not overestimated. We found that in the context of measuring the NSA of the proximal femur the reliability of the measurement, even under the best conditions, is only ±6° for different observers.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159801      PMCID: PMC3473462          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/29690721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines for measurement validation in clinical trial design.

Authors:  M M Sanchez; B S Binkowitz
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle.

Authors:  R M Kay; K A Jaki; D L Skaggs
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision.

Authors:  J L Knight; R D Atwater
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D S Garbuz; C P Duncan
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2000

5.  Patterns of sexual, bilateral and interpopulational variation in human femoral neck-shaft angles.

Authors:  J Y Anderson; E Trinkaus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Assessment of image post-processing and of measuring assistance tools in computed radiography. Evaluation of the weight-bearing knee.

Authors:  J Sanfridsson; G Svahn; L Ryd; T L Ahl; P Sundén; K Jonsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 7.  Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Fini; R Giardino; G Giavaresi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Ting Chen; Seung Woo Suh; Satyen Mehta; S Srinivasalu; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hip resurfacing revision rates: radiological audit of risk factors.

Authors:  I S Grewal; H A Kazi; M R Cope
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Hagen Andruszkow; Michael Frink; Cornelia Frömke; Amir Matityahu; Christian Zeckey; Philipp Mommsen; Stefanie Suntardjo; Christian Krettek; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The correlation between cutout and eccentric distance (ED) of the cephalic fixator tip in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation.

Authors:  Yun-Fa Yang; Jian-Wen Huang; Xiao-Sheng Gao; Zhong-He Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  Radiographic quantification of dynamic hip screw migration.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Flurin Cagienard; Christoph Martin Sprecher; Norbert Suhm; Marc Andreas Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Is PFNA-II a better implant for stable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly population ? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Navin Kumar Singh; Vijay Sharma; Vivek Trikha; Shiva Gamanagatti; Amit Roy; Avtar Singh Balawat; Palaniswamy Aravindh; Amrut Raje Diwakar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-02-07

7.  LCP 140° Pediatric Hip Plate for fixation of proximal femoral valgisation osteotomy.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; Kerstin Reidy; Hanspeter Huber; Stefan Dierauer; Leonhard E Ramseier
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Is labral hypotrophy correlated with increased acetabular depth?

Authors:  Felix Toft; Elmar Anliker; Martin Beck
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

9.  The Modified Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle: Age- and Sex-Dependent Reference Values and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Michael Frink; Janine Jostmeier; Stefan Haneder; Jens Dargel; Peer Eysel; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.