Literature DB >> 3361322

Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

T L Petersen1, G A Engh.   

Abstract

Standard anteroposterior standing radiographs (14 X 17-inch cassettes) and full-limb radiographs (51-inch) from a randomized group of 50 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty between January 1985 and June 1986 were analyzed. The mean tibiofemoral angle on short films was 5.8 degrees valgus, compared with 7.2 degrees valgus on full-limb films. This 1.4 degrees discrepancy had a standard deviation of 2.2 degrees, emphasizing the measurement variability in any individual case. The distance from the knee center to the mechanical axis related linearly to the tibiofemoral angle. Twenty-six percent (13 of 50) of knee arthroplasties failed to achieve satisfactory postoperative alignment of 4-10 degrees valgus in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361322     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(88)80054-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  58 in total

1.  Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; C Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.

Authors:  Lars Perlick; Holger Bäthis; Carsten Perlick; Christian Lüring; Markus Tingart; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of image-free navigation system for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Tigani; E Rimondi; P Trentani; M Ansaloni; L Amendola; D Testi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-12-29

5.  [Precise, computed-assisted leg angle correction with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy].

Authors:  R Hart; V Stipcák; B Kucera; P Filan; J deCordeiro
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery -- CAOS.

Authors:  Enes M Kanlić; Fabian Delarosa; Miguel Pirela-Cruz
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.363

8.  The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Samer S Morgan; A Bonshahi; N Pradhan; A Gregory; A Gambhir; M L Porter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  C Lüring; J Beckmann; P Haiböck; L Perlick; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.