Literature DB >> 15281387

Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Masako Jitsumori1, Hiroshi Makino.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we examined pigeons' recognition of video images of human faces. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to discriminate between frontal views of human faces in a go/no-go discrimination procedure. They then showed substantial generalization to novel views, even though human faces change radically as viewpoint changes. In Experiment 2, the pigeons tested in Experiment 1 failed to transfer to the faces dynamically rotating in depth. In Experiment 3, the pigeons trained to discriminate the dynamic stimuli showed excellent transfer to the corresponding static views, but responses to the positive faces decreased at novel viewpoints outside the range spanned by the dynamic stimuli. These results suggest that pigeons are insensitive to the three-dimensional properties of video images. Consideration is given to the nature of the task, relating to the identification of three-dimensional objects and to perceptual classifications based on similarity judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281387     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  26 in total

1.  Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons.

Authors:  L Huber; N F Troje; M Loidolt; U Aust; D Grass
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Pigeon pattern perception: limits on perspective invariance.

Authors:  J Cerella
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Y Moses; S Ullman; S Edelman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: An analysis with natural concept and pseudoconcept discriminations.

Authors:  S Watanabe
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; A Friedman; S L Reid
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  View-based models of 3D object recognition: invariance to imaging transformations.

Authors:  T Vetter; A Hurlbert; T Poggio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  Family resemblances facilitate formation and expansion of functional equivalence classes in pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Naoki Shimada; Sana Inoue
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman; Quoc C Vuong
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Learning-related shifts in generalization gradients for complex sounds.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Discrimination of human faces by archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Yarema Reshitnyk; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Visual Perception of Photographs of Rotated 3D Objects in Goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Jessica J Wegman; Evan Morrison; Kenneth Tyler Wilcox; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.