Literature DB >> 11409102

The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

M L Spetch1, A Friedman, S L Reid.   

Abstract

To explore whether effects observed in human object recognition represent fundamental properties of visual perception that are general across species, the authors trained pigeons (Columba livia) and humans to discriminate between pictures of 3-dimensional objects that differed in shape. Novel pictures of the depth-rotated objects were then tested for recognition. Across conditions, the object pairs contained either 0, 1, 3, or 5 distinctive parts. Pigeons showed viewpoint dependence in all object-part conditions, and their performance declined systematically with degree of rotation from the nearest training view. Humans showed viewpoint invariance for novel rotations between the training views but viewpoint dependence for novel rotations outside the training views. For humans, but not pigeons, viewpoint dependence was weakest in the 1-part condition. The authors discuss the results in terms of structural and multiple-view models of object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409102     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  11 in total

1.  Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Jeffrey Y M Siow; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  View combination in scene recognition.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

6.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman; Quoc C Vuong
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Promoting rotational-invariance in object recognition despite experience with only a single view.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Object similarity affects the perceptual strategy underlying invariant visual object recognition in rats.

Authors:  Federica B Rosselli; Alireza Alemi; Alessio Ansuini; Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.