Literature DB >> 8817621

Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.

Y Moses1, S Ullman, S Edelman.   

Abstract

An image of a face depends not only on its shape, but also on the viewpoint, illumination conditions, and facial expression. A face recognition system must overcome the changes in face appearance induced by these factors. Two related questions were investigated: the capacity of the human visual system to generalize the recognition of faces to novel images, and the level at which this generalization occurs. This problem was approached by comparing the identification and generalization capacity for upright and inverted faces. For upright faces, remarkably good generalization to novel conditions was found. For inverted faces, the generalization to novel views was significantly worse for both new illumination and viewpoint, although the performance on the training images was similar to that on the upright condition. The results indicate that at least some of the processes that support generalization across viewpoint and illumination are neither universal (because subjects did not generalize as easily for inverted faces as for upright ones) nor strictly object specific (because in upright faces nearly perfect generalization was possible from a single view, by itself insufficient for building a complete object-specific model). It is proposed that generalization in face recognition occurs at an intermediate level that is applicable to a class of objects, and that at this level upright and inverted faces initially constitute distinct object classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817621     DOI: 10.1068/p250443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  Testing instance models of face repetition priming.

Authors:  D C Hay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Serial position effects in short-term visual memory: a SIMPLE explanation?

Authors:  Dennis C Hay; Mary M Smyth; Graham J Hitch; Neil J Horton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

4.  Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Alissa Wright; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  Recognizing and identifying people: A neuropsychological review.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Sherryse L Corrow
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23

8.  Renewing the respect for similarity.

Authors:  Shimon Edelman; Reza Shahbazi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Effects of exposure to facial expression variation in face learning and recognition.

Authors:  Chang Hong Liu; Wenfeng Chen; James Ward
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-15

10.  Socially Important Faces Are Processed Preferentially to Other Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in a Priming Task across a Range of Viewpoints.

Authors:  Helen Keyes; Catherine Zalicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.